2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2007
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2007.357071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correspondence Evaluation in Local Shape Analysis and Structural Subdivision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant di↵erences on either shape were found after FDR correction. The raw p-values, however, suggest that both structures may exhibit group di↵erences in the tail and that the right caudate contains more group di↵erences than the left, an observation that agrees with results given in [98], [74], [100], and [81]. …”
Section: Shape Analysis Of Neuroanatomical Structuressupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…No significant di↵erences on either shape were found after FDR correction. The raw p-values, however, suggest that both structures may exhibit group di↵erences in the tail and that the right caudate contains more group di↵erences than the left, an observation that agrees with results given in [98], [74], [100], and [81]. …”
Section: Shape Analysis Of Neuroanatomical Structuressupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Di↵erences in the tail, especially on the right structure were also observed by Styner et al in [96]. These results also correlate with those reported for the spherical harmonics method (SPHARM) [100] and spherical wavelet analysis [81].…”
Section: Shape Analysis Of Neuroanatomical Structuressupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to these three theoretical measures, it is possible to evaluate the segmentation accuracy of the model on test data. The first evaluations of various methods of correspondence analysis of the shape are shown in the publication Styner [9]. Due to the very difficult evaluation of selected algorithms and the quality of the achieved results, we propose a new segmentation procedure possible, which should provide very reliable results.…”
Section: Segmentation Medical Image Datamentioning
confidence: 99%