Computers in Cardiology 2001. Vol.28 (Cat. No.01CH37287)
DOI: 10.1109/cic.2001.977645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corresponding IVUS and angiogram image data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the bending of IVUS catheter inside the vessel, the transducer pullback path could be shifted significantly away from the vessel centerline to reach a state of minimum bending energy, especially for the curved vessel segments. It has been reported that there was a significant delay from the moment the IVUS pullback machine was switched on and the moment the transducer tip really started to move [28]. This phenomenon could be explained by the stretching of the catheter to the minimum energy state before the transducer really started its pullback and hence, the transducer pullback path was expected to be shorter than the vessel centerline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because of the bending of IVUS catheter inside the vessel, the transducer pullback path could be shifted significantly away from the vessel centerline to reach a state of minimum bending energy, especially for the curved vessel segments. It has been reported that there was a significant delay from the moment the IVUS pullback machine was switched on and the moment the transducer tip really started to move [28]. This phenomenon could be explained by the stretching of the catheter to the minimum energy state before the transducer really started its pullback and hence, the transducer pullback path was expected to be shorter than the vessel centerline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The way of placing this models along the 3D curve corresponding to the N U S pullback is by orienting the X-and Y-axis of the IVUS image with the normal and binormal of the curve, respectively [8]. This allows transforming the 2D curve models to a 3D Non-Rational B-Spline (NURB) surface in OpenGL (see figure 9).…”
Section: Three-dimensional Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional registration approaches [1820] would require the reconstruction of the IVUS/OCT imaging wire or sheath from two angiographic views acquired, and assume it to be the pullback trajectory so that the IVUS/OCT cross-sectional images can be aligned along the trajectory. This is not a trivial task due to the difficulty in segmenting both IVUS/OCT imaging wire and vessel lumen and the requirement of a second angiographic view for the IVUS/OCT catheter, which is not always included in the current workflow.…”
Section: Xa-ivus/oct Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%