2020
DOI: 10.1112/topo.12124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum: A flexible construction of equivariant Floer homology and applications

Abstract: We correct a mistake regarding almost complex structures on Hilbert schemes of points in surfaces in Hendricks, Lipshitz and Sarkar (J. Topol. 9 (2016) 1153–1236). The error does not affect the main results of the paper, and only affects the proofs of invariance of equivariant symplectic Khovanov homology and reduced symplectic Khovanov homology. We give an alternate proof of the invariance of equivariant symplectic Khovanov homology.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 2. 4 We have not yet given an absolute grading for this definition. In fact, Proposition 2.2 is proved in the relatively graded case.…”
Section: Symplectic Khovanov Cohomology For Bridge Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2. 4 We have not yet given an absolute grading for this definition. In fact, Proposition 2.2 is proved in the relatively graded case.…”
Section: Symplectic Khovanov Cohomology For Bridge Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A knot concordance invariant. Applying equivariant Floer theory to the double branched covers, several knot (concordance) invariants are defined in Heegaard Floer homology, such as [2,16,24,25,27,28,38], and Seiberg-Witten Floer theory [8]. In a certain orbifold setting, several versions of knot instanton Floer homology are developed ( [13,15,46]).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• In [47], Seidel and Smith defined a version of equivariant Lagrangian Floer homology for symplectic involutions (𝐺 = ℤ 2 ). Generalizations to finite group actions appeared in [9,14,25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [47], Seidel and Smith defined a version of equivariant Lagrangian Floer homology for symplectic involutions (G=Z2$G = \mathbb {Z}_{2}$). Generalizations to finite group actions appeared in [9, 14, 25, 26]. In [27], Hendricks, Lipshitz and Sarkar defined an equivariant Lagrangian Floer homology for Lie group actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%