2020
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.597689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum: Considerations for Studying Sex as a Biological Variable in Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the prevalence of SCI is higher among males, the incidence of SCI in females is increasing ( 10 ). Sex appears to be a significant factor affecting outcomes following SCI, but its extent remains unclear because the inclusion of females in clinical studies is often underpowered and the vast majority of animal studies use a single sex ( 11 , 12 ). However, some indications of sexual dimorphism have emerged; improved outcomes have been observed for females 1-year post-SCI using American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) metrics ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the prevalence of SCI is higher among males, the incidence of SCI in females is increasing ( 10 ). Sex appears to be a significant factor affecting outcomes following SCI, but its extent remains unclear because the inclusion of females in clinical studies is often underpowered and the vast majority of animal studies use a single sex ( 11 , 12 ). However, some indications of sexual dimorphism have emerged; improved outcomes have been observed for females 1-year post-SCI using American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) metrics ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GR of 0.25 was used as a threshold based on the epidemiological occurrence of 0.25 for female:male in the United States for SCI. 4 A GR greater than 0.25 suggests increased gender diversity. Because of unreported data, only 53 trials were included in our analysis on race.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%