2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to “An earthquake scenario for the microzonation of Sofia and the vulnerability of structures designed by use of the Eurocodes”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Published historical documents prove the occurrence of destructive earthquakes during the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries in the Sofia region (WATZOV, 1902) and the largest earthquakes are those which occurred in 1818 with epicentral intensity I o = VIII-IX MSK-64, in 1858 with I o = IX-X (near Sofia), and in 1905 with M *6.5 (near the town of Trun in the western marginal part of the Sofia region). The epicentral macroseismic intensity, I o * X, summarising the heavy destruction in the town of Sofia in 1858, was first evaluated on the MSK64 scale (PETKOV and CHRISTOSKOV, 1965a, b) and updated later on the EMS98 scale (PASKALEVA et al, 2007). Here and in the following text, when non-integer values for the epicentral intensity are reported in the literature we use the symbol * followed by an integer.…”
Section: The Earthquake Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Published historical documents prove the occurrence of destructive earthquakes during the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries in the Sofia region (WATZOV, 1902) and the largest earthquakes are those which occurred in 1818 with epicentral intensity I o = VIII-IX MSK-64, in 1858 with I o = IX-X (near Sofia), and in 1905 with M *6.5 (near the town of Trun in the western marginal part of the Sofia region). The epicentral macroseismic intensity, I o * X, summarising the heavy destruction in the town of Sofia in 1858, was first evaluated on the MSK64 scale (PETKOV and CHRISTOSKOV, 1965a, b) and updated later on the EMS98 scale (PASKALEVA et al, 2007). Here and in the following text, when non-integer values for the epicentral intensity are reported in the literature we use the symbol * followed by an integer.…”
Section: The Earthquake Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last attempts at a SHA via seismic wave propagation modelling for the purpose of seismic microzonation of Sofia and vulnerability estimation of the built stock (PASKALEVA, 2002;SLAVOV et al, 2004;PASKALEVA, 2003;PASKALEVA et al, 2007PASKALEVA et al, , 2008DINEVA et al, 2008 ) made use of an advanced innovative, scenario based NDSHA procedure . DINEVA and PASKALEVA (2008) present a hybrid method, combining modal summation and boundary integral equations (MS-BIEM) for site-response estimation, using idealized 2D symmetric models.…”
Section: Seismic Hazard Assessment (Sha) and Seismic Microzonation Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, NDSHA does not make use of ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs), which do not preserve the tensor nature of earthquake ground motion (as shown by Paskaleva et al, 2007). Contrary to probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA), this approach does not rely on the statistical characterisation of earthquake recurrence, which is severely restricted by the available observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kobe (17.1.1995), Gujarat (26.1.2001), Bam (26.12.2003) and Port-au-Prince (12.1.2010) prove once more that for the urban areas to be safe and sustainable, a long-range urban planning must be implemented, based on multidisciplinary risk assessment tools. The challenge of urban susceptibility mapping is to predict the ground motion effects related to various sources, path and site characteristics not just at a single site but over an extended region, and to do so with an acceptable level of reliability (Paskaleva et al, 2007). Nowadays, efforts are focused on expanding the spatial approach to organizing residential and urban areas in regional dimensions (Clark et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%