2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to “Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data” Gynecol. Oncol. 154 (2019) 441–448

Abstract: Corrigendum to "Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data" Gynecol. Oncol. 154 (2019) 441-448

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CA125 level as a measure for clinical outcome can be debated. CA125 is elevated in, on average, 80% of EOC patients at time of diagnosis [22]. In our study, one patient did not have elevated CA125 at diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CA125 level as a measure for clinical outcome can be debated. CA125 is elevated in, on average, 80% of EOC patients at time of diagnosis [22]. In our study, one patient did not have elevated CA125 at diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…This points out the difficulty of determining an appropriate measure for clinical outcome. Therefore, in an expansion of this study, different variables to measure the response to chemotherapy will be taken into account, including CA125 level, outcome of CT-scan using RECIST-criteria [24,25], outcome of the debulking surgery, and the histopathologic chemotherapy response score [22]. These variables, together with platinum sensitivity, PFS, and OS will further substantiate the conclusion for clinical outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since its definition by Bohm and colleagues in 2015, CRS has been validated in multiple cohorts as a reproducible histopathologic scoring system that provides valuable prognostic information for women with tubo-ovarian cancer treated with NACT/IDS (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). First, our study corroborates these findings in a large dataset.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Notably, while most studies have focused on high-grade serous carcinoma, our cohort includes other types of high-grade cancers, with 11% representing other high-grade ovarian tumors. Despite including additional tumor types, our CRS score distribution remained comparable to other studies and was most similar to a meta-analysis that examined 877 cases of high-grade serous carcinoma across multiple centers internationally (11). This may suggest that CRS warrants further investigation to determine whether it may apply more broadly to other high-grade tubo-ovarian tumors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation