2017
DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i2.1055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum: What Makes a Difference for Disadvantaged Girls? Investigating the Interplay between Group Composition and Positive Youth Development in Sport

Abstract: This is a corrigendum to the article "What makes a difference for disadvantaged girls? Investigating the interplay between group composition and positive youth development in sport", authored by Hebe Schaillée, Marc Theeboom and Jelle Van Cauwenberg, and published in Social Inclusion, 3(3).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broader contemporary international political controversies or the wearing of "political" symbols continue to spark controversy among player, fan and political communities alike (See for example Kelly, 2013Kelly, , 2016. Playing, and participating in football as a fan, are also welcome forms of escapism from social isolation, with ongoing debates examining the rationale for investment in sport as a mechanism to promote social inclusion (see Coalter, 2015;Collins & Haudenhuyse, 2015;Parnell & Richardson, 2014;Parnell, Pringle, Widdop, & Zwolinsky, 2015;Rich, Misener, & Dubeau, 2015;Schaillée, Theeboom, & Van Cauwenberg, 2015;Spaaij, Magee, & Jeanes, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broader contemporary international political controversies or the wearing of "political" symbols continue to spark controversy among player, fan and political communities alike (See for example Kelly, 2013Kelly, , 2016. Playing, and participating in football as a fan, are also welcome forms of escapism from social isolation, with ongoing debates examining the rationale for investment in sport as a mechanism to promote social inclusion (see Coalter, 2015;Collins & Haudenhuyse, 2015;Parnell & Richardson, 2014;Parnell, Pringle, Widdop, & Zwolinsky, 2015;Rich, Misener, & Dubeau, 2015;Schaillée, Theeboom, & Van Cauwenberg, 2015;Spaaij, Magee, & Jeanes, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%