2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507117102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corroboration of in vivo cartilage pressures with implications for synovial joint tribology and osteoarthritis causation

Abstract: Pressures on normal human acetabular cartilage have been collected from two implanted instrumented femoral head hemiprostheses. Despite significant differences in subjects' gender, morphology, mobility, and coordination, in vivo pressure measurements from both subjects covered similar ranges, with maximums of 5-6 MPa in gait, and as high as 18 MPa in other movements. Normalized for subject weight and height (nMPa), for free-speed walking the maximum pressure values were 25.2 for the female subject and 24.5 for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
75
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Early signs of articular cartilage wear have recently been associated with a loss of the boundary lubrication function of SF postinjury (32). Accordingly, boundary lubrication has been postulated to be critical to cartilage homeostasis by facilitating low friction and low wear (2). Future studies of the postulated role of boundary and other modes of lubrication in arthritic disease are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early signs of articular cartilage wear have recently been associated with a loss of the boundary lubrication function of SF postinjury (32). Accordingly, boundary lubrication has been postulated to be critical to cartilage homeostasis by facilitating low friction and low wear (2). Future studies of the postulated role of boundary and other modes of lubrication in arthritic disease are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lubricant molecules within a surface layer or film at the articular surface also mediate load bearing, particularly the surface-to-surface contact in the boundary mode of lubrication. This mode of lubrication has been proposed to be important for the protection and maintenance of articular surfaces since the apposing cartilage layers within the joint make contact over ϳ10% of the total area, where much of the friction may occur (2). Synovial fluid (SF) contains the molecules hyaluronan (HA) (3), proteoglycan 4 (PRG4) (the name assigned by the Human Genome Organization Gene Nomenclature Committee for proteins also known as lubricin, superficial zone protein, and megakaryocyte-stimulating factor) (4,5), and surface-active phospholipids (SAPL) (6), each of which interacts with and adsorbs to the articular surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 We note that in a real joint the bounding surfaces (i.e., the cartilage) are in fact charged, porous and compressible 25,26 and several mechanisms of joint lubrication have been suggested based on these physical properties of cartilage and their interaction with the synovial fluid. These include squeeze-film lubrication, 25 weeping lubrication, [27][28][29] boundary lubrication mediated by surface adsorbed lubricin proteins, 30 and electrostatic binding of an HA network to the cartilage. 26 While our simple picture of the compressing joint (as illustrated in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that these in vivo measurements were performed with angular velocities above 30 ∘ and therefore also include the dynamic component of loading. The limitations of the direct stress measurement method (Morrell et al, 2005) include the facts that the sensors measure the cartilage-on-metal surface and not the cartilage-on-cartilage surface, that the metal prosthesis in contact with natural acetabulum may differ from physiologic morphology of the hip, that sensors were located on the femoral head surface while the values of stress on the acetabular joint surface were estimated from the kinematic data. Further, hip pressure measurements of abduction exercises were performed in one patient only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%