2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion effects on the seismic response of existing rc frames designed according to different building codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean compressive strength of concrete, assumed as C25 class for existing structure and C30 class for RCframed skin, was evaluated according to Model Code 2010 [29]. The mean yield strength, hardening ratio, and ultimate strain of the existing structure's steel were selected by means of STIL software [30,31], where the probability distributions for those quantities are given based on an extensive database of experimental tests on reinforcing bars collected from samples of the second half of the last century, while the same properties for RC-framed skin's steel (assumed as a reinforcing steel of class B450C) was taken from available experimental results [32]. A Kent-Scott-Park constitutive model [33,34] with no tensile strength was selected for concrete, while an elastic-plastic law with strain hardening was selected for reinforcement.…”
Section: Seismic Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean compressive strength of concrete, assumed as C25 class for existing structure and C30 class for RCframed skin, was evaluated according to Model Code 2010 [29]. The mean yield strength, hardening ratio, and ultimate strain of the existing structure's steel were selected by means of STIL software [30,31], where the probability distributions for those quantities are given based on an extensive database of experimental tests on reinforcing bars collected from samples of the second half of the last century, while the same properties for RC-framed skin's steel (assumed as a reinforcing steel of class B450C) was taken from available experimental results [32]. A Kent-Scott-Park constitutive model [33,34] with no tensile strength was selected for concrete, while an elastic-plastic law with strain hardening was selected for reinforcement.…”
Section: Seismic Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attainment of ductile and brittle failures in the first elements, according to Equations ( 2) and ( 3), is marked in the capacity curves using for chord rotation capacity a yellow circle and for shear capacity a green triangle. Moreover, the type of elements where the limit is reached is highlighted by the letter C for column and B for beam (see also [23]).…”
Section: Structural Capacity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the whole structure under seismic actions may have a performance worse than the estimated one. Nowadays, the assessment of corroded RC structures is mainly modeled by considering the steel and (eventually) the concrete deterioration [18][19][20][21]. Rarely, the bond-slip law as well as the buckling effects are considered [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%