2013
DOI: 10.1039/c2ee23686a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion of magnesium electrolytes: chlorides – the culprit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
213
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
213
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The anodic currents below the decomposition potential of the electrolyte on Pt working electrodes have been reported for Mg electrolytes with similar composition before and were attributed to pitting corrosion of the current collectors. 8,9,11,12 This observation was confirmed by investigation of the current collectors after the polarization by SEM, showing that the surface of the current collectors were covered with corrosion pits which is shown exemplarily for a Ni current collector in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anodic currents below the decomposition potential of the electrolyte on Pt working electrodes have been reported for Mg electrolytes with similar composition before and were attributed to pitting corrosion of the current collectors. 8,9,11,12 This observation was confirmed by investigation of the current collectors after the polarization by SEM, showing that the surface of the current collectors were covered with corrosion pits which is shown exemplarily for a Ni current collector in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The anodic currents below the decomposition potential of the electrolyte on Pt working electrodes have been reported for Mg electrolytes with similar composition before and were attributed to pitting corrosion of the current collectors. 8,9,11,12 This observation was confirmed by investigation of the current collectors after the polarization by SEM, showing that the surface of the current collectors were covered with corrosion pits which is shown exemplarily for a Ni current collector in Figure 1b.Motivated by previous reports of high anodic stability of Grignard based electrolytes on glassy carbon and carbon coated Ti working electrodes, 9 the corrosion resistance of carbonaceous surfaces was investigated by linear sweep voltammetry and chronoamperometry.As shown in Figure 2a, a high anodic stability beyond 3 V was observed for a graphite current collector in linear sweep voltammetry. During chronoamperometry at a potential of 2.5 V vs. Mg/Mg 2+ no increase of the current density was measured during 48 h, confirming the good stability of the graphite current collector in the electrolyte.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…18 4 The cyclic voltammetry measurement is further conducted using a two-electrode coin cell with a Cu foil as the working electrode and a Mg ribbon as the counter electrode. The Cu electrode in the coin cell is stable below 1.7 V vs. Mg, and an increase in anodic current (about 0.3 mA cm −2 ) is observed above 1.78 V vs. Mg, as shown in the inset of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18] However, these electrolytes may corrode non-inert current collectors at lower anodic potentials duo to the presence of halides in the cation and anion components of the electrolytes, although some of these electrolytes have shown impressive stability against electrochemical oxidation. 19 Hence, it is still necessary to find electrolytes with high stabilities on non-inert current collectors for a practical rechargeable Mg battery system. Nelson et al showed that decreasing the chloride content in Mg electrolytes by switching the Lewis acid from AlCl 3 to Al(OPh) 3 greatly improves the anodic stability up to 5 V on both Pt and stainless steel electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%