2018
DOI: 10.5006/2951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion Performance of Low Alloy Steels in Sub-Arctic Natural Seawater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the Table, it can be seen that the average corrosion rate of control coupons without protection was 0.069 mm y -1 , and the corrosion rates of protected coupons, depending on the protection current, were in the range 0.009-0.074 mm y -1 . The results on corrosion of coupons without protection were in agreement with the previous corrosion tests of shipbuilding low alloy steels in similar waters of the Amursky Bay [18]. The coupons protected by currents of 231 mA m -2 and 463 mA m -2 had the lowest corrosion rates of 0.013 mm y -1 and 0.009 mm y -1 , respectively, which indicates their protective effect up to 86%.…”
Section: Results and Its Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…From the Table, it can be seen that the average corrosion rate of control coupons without protection was 0.069 mm y -1 , and the corrosion rates of protected coupons, depending on the protection current, were in the range 0.009-0.074 mm y -1 . The results on corrosion of coupons without protection were in agreement with the previous corrosion tests of shipbuilding low alloy steels in similar waters of the Amursky Bay [18]. The coupons protected by currents of 231 mA m -2 and 463 mA m -2 had the lowest corrosion rates of 0.013 mm y -1 and 0.009 mm y -1 , respectively, which indicates their protective effect up to 86%.…”
Section: Results and Its Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The remaining thickness of specimens was obtained through an optical 3D digitizing system, and the study evaluated the mechanical properties of the steel specimens. Chernov et al (2018) reported observations related to corrosion progress in ship structural steel exposed to Sub-Arctic water as well as temperate water, and compared the corrosion behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an excess of extraneous electrolyte, transfer under the action of an electric field is not required, and the distribution of the concentrations of hydroxide, hydrocarbonate and carbonate ions (C1, C2 and C3, respectively) in the diffusion layer is determined by their diffusion transport taking into account the homogeneous carbonate equilibrium (3). Determining the distribution of concentrations of hydroxide ions, bicarbonate ions, and carbonate ions in the diffusion layer with possible co-crystallization of calcium carbonate and magnesium hydroxide is reduced to the solution of the system [8]…”
Section: Theoretical and Experimental Study Of Calcareous Deposit Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seawater is a very aggressive corrosive medium for various metal structures, depending on the nature of the metal, the chemical and microbiological composition of seawater and its physicochemical characteristics. The accumulated centuries-old experience of experimental study of corrosion losses and numerous theoretical works still do not allow understanding the subtleties of the process of metal corrosion in natural sea water [1][2][3]. Despite this, most researchers believe that the most effective protection of low-alloy steels in seawater is cathodic protection, the essence of which lies in imposing an external cathode current on the protected product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%