2018
DOI: 10.1002/maco.201709942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion resistance of chromium‐steel and stainless steel reinforcement in concrete

Abstract: This paper presents results of a study conducted to determine the corrosion‐resistance of chromium‐steel (ASTM A1035 steel) and several stainless steel grades (316LN, 304, 2205, and XM‐28), as concrete reinforcements. The study included laboratory experiments investigating the reinforcements’ performance in a concrete pore solution containing chlorides, with and without wetting and drying cycles, as well as in cases of cracked and uncracked concretes exposed to chlorides. The study also included field‐exposure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 17 ] A manganese‐containing stainless steel XM‐28 (with 18% Mn but without molybdenum) was found less corrosion‐resistant compared to 304 or 316LN stainless steels. [ 18 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 17 ] A manganese‐containing stainless steel XM‐28 (with 18% Mn but without molybdenum) was found less corrosion‐resistant compared to 304 or 316LN stainless steels. [ 18 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical method means to judge the corrosion status of steel bars indirectly according to the content of chemical composition in concrete protective layer (PH value of pore fluid, chloride ion content on steel bar surface, etc.) [ 30 ]. However, the chemical method is required to destroy the structure, and the location, speed, and state of corrosion cannot be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of Cr and Mo at 5% and 0.4% composition within this steel offers improved corrosion resistance compared to the traditional carbon steels [5][6][7]. The limited presence of chromium causes the formation of passive protective film against the attack of corrosive anions while Mo offers improved resistance to localized corrosion especially pitting [8][9][10][11][12]. In addition to this, use of chemical compounds known as corrosion inhibition can complement the protective ability of the alloying elements on the low carbon mold steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%