International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility 1992
DOI: 10.1109/isemc.1992.626119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosion Resistant Composite Material For EMI/EMP Hardening Protection In Marine (or Similarly Hostile) Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the comparison of the SE with regards to metal type, Cu showed about 5.98% better SE than Fe on average throughout all studied frequency ranges ( Figure 3 ). Thus, as an EMP shielding material, Cu showed better SE than Fe and this might be due to the conductivity and mechanical properties, which affects the SE values [ 40 ]. The required SE values against each studied frequency are shown by a red line in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the comparison of the SE with regards to metal type, Cu showed about 5.98% better SE than Fe on average throughout all studied frequency ranges ( Figure 3 ). Thus, as an EMP shielding material, Cu showed better SE than Fe and this might be due to the conductivity and mechanical properties, which affects the SE values [ 40 ]. The required SE values against each studied frequency are shown by a red line in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%