Corrosion–wear mechanisms of hard coated austenitic 316L stainless steels

Dearnley, P. A.; Aldrich-Smith, G.

doi:10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00559-3

Cited by 106 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These include ion beam deposition [16], pulsed laser ablation [17] and ion beam conversion [18]; each method can be used to create desirable coating properties. For example ion beam conversion can be used to dope DLC coatings with elements such as sulphur, fluorine or nitrogen that serve to reduce friction [19].…”

Section: Production and Depositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diamond like carbon coatings for potential application in biological implants—a review

Love

Cook

Harvey

et al. 2013

Tribology International

237

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tProduction of wear debris has been linked to the failure of numerous hip implants. With the current focus on increasing the implant longevity, thus wear and corrosion resistance is important. Hard coatings have the potential to reduce the wear and corrosion. Diamond like Carbon (DLC) coatings exhibit properties that could make them viable for implants. This paper critically reviews previously published research into usage of DLC coatings for implants. Overall DLCs seem to be an effective coating for implants but with the variance in results, further testing is required for clarification of use.

show abstract

Section: Production and Depositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diamond like carbon coatings for potential application in biological implants—a review

Love

Cook

Harvey

et al. 2013

Tribology International

237

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dearnley and Aldrich-Smith [20] have proposed three major wear-corrosion mechanisms of coated metallic systems that are of types I, II and II. These are schematically represented in figures 5, 6 and 7, respectively.…”

Section: Wear-corrosion Interactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tribo-corrosion of coatings: a review

Wood¹

2007

J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.

231

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reviews the available literature relating to the emerging research into the performance of coatings under combined wear and corrosion conditions. Understanding how coatings perform under these tribo-corrosion conditions is essential if the service life of equipment is to be predicted and to allow service life to be extended. Therefore, the tribo-corrosion performance of coatings deposited by a variety of techniques is discussed and the main mechanisms associated with their degradation under combined wear and corrosion highlighted. Coating composition, microstructure, defect level, adhesion, cohesion and substrate properties are seen as some of the critical elements in coating performance when subjected to tribo-corrosion contacts. The importance of post-coating deposition treatments such as laser resurfacing and sealing are also discussed. Interactions between wear and corrosion mechanisms are identified along with some models and mapping techniques that aim to inform coating selection and predict performance. Recent investigations into mono-layer as well as multilayered and functionally graded coatings are reviewed as candidates for wear-corrosion resistant surfaces. The review reveals the need for a more considered approach to tribo-corrosion testing and the way in which the results are analysed and presented. For example, the test conditions should be appropriate to the coating system under test; the level of in situ instrumentation deployed and the post-test analysis of in situ electrochemical data should be carefully selected as well as details given of the composition of any surface tribofilms formed and the identification of the degradation mechanisms.

show abstract

“…Significant effort has been undertaken into developing a greater understanding of the abrasion-corrosion wear properties of stainless steels and for a range of different applications [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Stainless steels are known to have the ability to form a protective passive film on their surface when exposed to a corrosive media.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Their experiments used an aerated 22% NaCl solution at temperatures ranging between room temperature and 80 • C, and they found that although the P558 alloy is not the cheapest, it has superior wear resistance and mechanical properties [6]. Dearnley suggested an alternative way of improving the resistance of S31603 stainless steel to surface degradation by applying a thin (6-8 m) plasma-based hard cathodic coating of CrN and an experimental S-phase [7]. The success of this approach depended on the nature of the pervading corrosion-wear mechanisms.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synergistic effects of micro-abrasion–corrosion of UNS S30403, S31603 and S32760 stainless steels

Bello

Wood

Wharton

2007

Wear

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, the synergistic effects of abrasion and corrosion on UNS S30403, S31603 and S32760 stainless steels have been investigated using a micro-abrasion test rig. The stainless steel samples have been studied under both pure abrasion (PA) and abrasion-corrosion (AC) conditions simulated by using silicon carbide based slurries in either distilled water or 3.5% sodium chloride solutions. Tests have been conducted at various abrasive concentrations (0.006-0.238 g/cm 3 ) and at 38 and 180 m sliding distance to enable the interactions between abrasion and corrosion to be better understood. Wear mode identification and regime mapping was used to establish the dominant wear mechanism at the different slurry concentrations. The synergistic effect has been quantified and related to the material composition and the grooving or rolling abrasive wear mechanisms present. The synergistic levels were typically positive and have been discussed in terms of their dependence on the integrity of the passive films and the repassivation kinetics. The three-body abrasion-corrosion rates for all steels were found to be 14 times higher than two-body abrasion-corrosion rates. S30403 shows weak repassivation performance with electrochemical activity being proportional to mechanical activity. S31603 showed a constant electrochemical activity over a variety of mechanical conditions, indicating a stronger repassivation performance than S30403. S32760 has the best repassivation performance with negative synergistic characteristics until abrasion rate are such that depassivation occurs and the electrochemical activity is then comparable to the other steels.

show abstract

Corrosion–wear mechanisms of hard coated austenitic 316L stainless steels

Cited by 106 publications

References 4 publications

Diamond like carbon coatings for potential application in biological implants—a review

Diamond like carbon coatings for potential application in biological implants—a review

Tribo-corrosion of coatings: a review

Synergistic effects of micro-abrasion–corrosion of UNS S30403, S31603 and S32760 stainless steels

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About