2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrosive places, inhuman spaces: Mental health in Australian immigration detention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Children in long term immigration detention are at risk of serious mental harm (Jureidini and Burnside [56]; Mares et al [64]; Procter [89]). McLoughlin et al [70]) argue that it is not only asylum seekers' traumatic experiences in their home countries that create mental and physical sickness, but also the conditions of detention and the places of detention. Asylum seekers are "taken away from their homelands and stripped of personhood, they occupy an indeterminate space in which they are rendered structurally invisible.…”
Section: The Pacific Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children in long term immigration detention are at risk of serious mental harm (Jureidini and Burnside [56]; Mares et al [64]; Procter [89]). McLoughlin et al [70]) argue that it is not only asylum seekers' traumatic experiences in their home countries that create mental and physical sickness, but also the conditions of detention and the places of detention. Asylum seekers are "taken away from their homelands and stripped of personhood, they occupy an indeterminate space in which they are rendered structurally invisible.…”
Section: The Pacific Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars (Coffey et al, 2010;Hall, 2010;Wilder, 2007) call attention to the poor food, limited health care, sporadic or infrequent access to legal assistance, cold temperatures, and dehumanized nature of detention facilities. Detention facilities are psychologically destructive as well (McLoughlin& Warin, 2008). In just one of many examples of the psychological destruction that occurs within detention facilities, Oxfam Australia (Bem et al, 2007) documented conditions in facilities on Nauru in the mid-2000s, which included:…”
Section: Field Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, for example, there has been considerable public concern about the conditions in privately run detention facilities and particularly the ability of private security firms to provide for the physical and mental health of detainees. 15 While it may be tempting to view the involvement of private enterprise in migration regulation as a sign of the state's failure to manage its borders, these developments can equally be seen as constituting a shift in modes of regulation rather than a fundamental change in state function. 16 Migration control is a politically fraught arena.…”
Section: Outsourcing Border Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%