2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1366-7017(02)00037-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption and allocation of water: the case of public irrigation in Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exceptions include Rinaudo (2002) who provided a detailed account of corruption on irrigation in Pakistan, and Venot et al (2011) on water reservoirs in Ghana. As yet, there are no robust studies on the effects of corruption in the water sector.…”
Section: Public Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exceptions include Rinaudo (2002) who provided a detailed account of corruption on irrigation in Pakistan, and Venot et al (2011) on water reservoirs in Ghana. As yet, there are no robust studies on the effects of corruption in the water sector.…”
Section: Public Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure is high because some of the farmers on Khadir middle reach reported paying up to Rs. 700/ha, as the water charges paid also include charges paid for water from public tubewells, and illegal charges by Patwari (collector) as reported by farmers (see Rinaudo, 2002 for more detailed analysis of corruption in canal irrigation in Pakistan). Excluding these cases, the average canal water charge is around Rs.…”
Section: Profitability Of Wheat Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corruption was seen as a main reason for the poor performance of canalirrigated agriculture. Similar studies have been undertaken in Pakistan (Rinaudo 2002 ) to show how corruption determines water allocation and that it entails not only the rich and infl uential farmers but also powerless small-scale farmers. Another study pointed to the role of patronage and clientelistic linkages in petty corruption in Kazakhstan and grand-scale political capture in Chile as determinants of how water resources are allocated within agriculture (Warner et al 2009 ).…”
Section: Approaches To Water Integritymentioning
confidence: 73%