2013
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(13)00127-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption and National Competitiveness in Different Stages of Country Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlational analysis, however, indicated that with the exception of voice and accountability, the competitiveness index showed a significant positive correlation with all other explanatory variables. This confirms the works of Podobnik et al (2012) and Ulman (2013).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The correlational analysis, however, indicated that with the exception of voice and accountability, the competitiveness index showed a significant positive correlation with all other explanatory variables. This confirms the works of Podobnik et al (2012) and Ulman (2013).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Obviously, the supplementary level of corruption strongly reduces a country's prospects for an improvement in its wealth [34]. Thus, the correlation between the inverse corruption and competitiveness indices is very strong, which means that a high level of corruption has a significant negative impact on national competitiveness [35]. Assuming that there is a valid relationship between the competitiveness and economic growth of a given country, we can also claim that an increased level of these two factors positively influences the reported fraud cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having influence on the organization of general and university schooling, the state shapes the quality and level of education, e.g., [149,150], as well as dimensions and attributes of social capital. According to global research, a low level of social capital is prone to produce corruption and nepotism at the meeting point of power and business, which also leads to a deficit in morality, low levels of trust to state organizations, and depreciation of other social capital attributes [117,151]. Thus, the last authors draw the following research conclusion: "( .…”
Section: Gap In the Quality Of Institutional Factors And Human Capital Between Eu Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%