2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-015-0687-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption and population health outcomes: an analysis of data from 133 countries using structural equation modeling

Abstract: Our results suggest that there is no direct relationship between health expenditures and health outcomes after controlling for the other factors in the model. Our study enhances our understanding of the conceptual and theoretical links between corruption and health outcomes in a population, including factors that may mediate how corruption can affect health outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
38
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the one evaluation that provided compelling evidence of the effects of an intervention to reduce corruption suggests that it is possible to document at least some of the effects of interventions to reduce corruption using routinely-collected data as part of anti-corruption efforts (USA 2005-2014). Moreover, it is feasible to undertake rigorous evaluations of the effects of interventions to reduce corruption (Björkman 2007; Björkman 2009; Blais 2007; Ferraz 2005), and others have recognised the need for rigorous evaluations (Johnsøn 2013; Peisakhin 2011). However, it seems likely that this need is not widely recognised, given how few rigorous evaluations we found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the one evaluation that provided compelling evidence of the effects of an intervention to reduce corruption suggests that it is possible to document at least some of the effects of interventions to reduce corruption using routinely-collected data as part of anti-corruption efforts (USA 2005-2014). Moreover, it is feasible to undertake rigorous evaluations of the effects of interventions to reduce corruption (Björkman 2007; Björkman 2009; Blais 2007; Ferraz 2005), and others have recognised the need for rigorous evaluations (Johnsøn 2013; Peisakhin 2011). However, it seems likely that this need is not widely recognised, given how few rigorous evaluations we found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although randomised studies provide the best possible evidence of the effects of interventions to reduce corruption, there are practical hindrances to the use of randomisation (Johnsøn 2013; Peisakhin 2011). For our primary objective, we searched for interrupted time series (ITS) studies with at least three time points before and after the start of the intervention, and controlled before-and-after (CBA) studies with at least two sites in each comparison group, as well as for randomised and non-randomised trials (Cochrane EPOC 2013a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1996, the then-president of the World Bank, James D. Wolfensohn, declared: “For developing countries to achieve growth and poverty reduction, we need to deal with the cancer of corruption” (Bhargava 2006, p. 1). Corruption especially affects health, because in development countries it prevails in water and sanitation management and in the health sector itself, in this way representing a direct death toll, especially of children (Azfar and Gurgur 2008; Hanf et al 2011; Factor and Kang 2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the level at which it occurs, corruption obstructs the delivery of resources, services, medications, and benefits to those who are most in need, unduly impacting low-income Kenyans, and can lead directly to poor health outcomes [10, 11]. Unchecked corruption threatens the stability of international aid, health programming [12], and national economic growth [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%