2020
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption as Infrastructure: Rendering the New Saigon Global

Abstract: (69085). I would like to thank the three anonymous IJURR reviewers for their generous comments and suggestions. An early version of this article was workshopped at a panel organized by Malini Ranganathan and Sapana Doshi at the annual meeting of the American Association of Geographers. My thanks to them for their constructive feedback. I also thank Sylvia Nam for her generous and insightful comments throughout the writing of this article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the wake of the post-Washington Consensus, a rising global anti-corruption industry promoted neoliberal governmental reforms by locating corruption in the public sector, imagining it as endemic to the global south, proposing legalistic and technical reforms, and avoiding confronting elite alliances of power, ultimately preparing ground for Western-driven market expansion (Hindess, 2005; Bukovansky, 2006). An emerging body of work evaluates the social lives of corruption, including as a contested analytic (Goldstein and Drybread, 2018), a “infrastructure” of political-economic action (Kim, 2020) and a repertoire of profiteering practices intertwined with capitalist social relations (Tucker, 2020). Corruption is ordinary, compiling the quotidian practices of actors throughout the field of power called the state (Gupta, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wake of the post-Washington Consensus, a rising global anti-corruption industry promoted neoliberal governmental reforms by locating corruption in the public sector, imagining it as endemic to the global south, proposing legalistic and technical reforms, and avoiding confronting elite alliances of power, ultimately preparing ground for Western-driven market expansion (Hindess, 2005; Bukovansky, 2006). An emerging body of work evaluates the social lives of corruption, including as a contested analytic (Goldstein and Drybread, 2018), a “infrastructure” of political-economic action (Kim, 2020) and a repertoire of profiteering practices intertwined with capitalist social relations (Tucker, 2020). Corruption is ordinary, compiling the quotidian practices of actors throughout the field of power called the state (Gupta, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of gifts and facilitation payments are common when dealing with frontline civil servants (World Bank, 2013). Giang and Pheng (2015) and Kim (2020) also demonstrate that the corruption system has evolved into an infrastructure and determines how the resources are allocated. The Provincial Competitiveness Index (PCI) 2013 shows that grand corruption by top officials (such as kickbacks on procurement contracts) has increased over time.…”
Section: The Vietnam Contextmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As economic tides changed in the 2000s, reducing the need for self-building and increasing state capacity to pursue orderly, modern urban development, the locus of insurgency shifted to the periurban fringe and sharply diverged from the national state’s new ideology of economic development embodied in the consumerist trappings of sleek, orderly KĐTMs. Local practice was then reshaped by a new set of incentives brought by KĐTMs and their developers: the infrastructure of corruption that animates Vietnamese urban development (Kim, 2020) has made the enforcement of expropriation a priority for the local state regardless of the resistance it routinely incurs. These incentives align perfectly with the national state’s ideological image of urban and rural development: building an orderly city and phasing out subsistence agriculture.…”
Section: The Ambivalence Of the Developmentalist Statementioning
confidence: 99%