Corruption in Indonesia’s Emerging Democracy

Abstract

Much has been studied by political scientists about practices of corruption and their implications for development. They have provided useful analysis on the causes and impacts of corruption. In contrast, sociologists seem to have glossed over issues of corruption. This article aims to contribute to the sociology of organization by reconstructing a theoretical framework of organizational institutionalism through understanding corruption in an emerging democracy. Using cases of corruption in Indonesia, this article intends to enrich previous perspectives on social construction and contestation of corruption occurring in democratizing polities. It explores the extent to which reform in formal governance has taken into account informal arrangements to eradicate corruption. Secondary data and focused group discussions have been used to collect data. The findings inform that informal organizational networks of corruption emerge and develop within formal organizational relationships. On the other hand, informal norms and networks also exist that potentially facilitate anticorruption initiatives. This article recommends that the Corruption Eradication Commission, as the main anticorruption body, improves its understanding of the connections among public organizations, and between public organizations and societal organizations. This will enable public leaders to adopt a combination of the principles of Western and formal governance and existing informal arrangements to combat corruption. The sociology of organization will benefit from adopting the concept of informal organizational networks of corruption to illuminate the “dark corners” of formal organizational relationships.

“Corruption Is Us”: Tackling Corruption by Examining the Interplay Between Formal Rules and Informal Norms Within the Russian Construction Industry

“…The question that needs to be addressed is, how can a “culture of probity” be created among public officials and how to ensure popular reliance on formal norms and institutions that is based on sincere belief in and respect for the rule of law (Silva, 2016, p. 200)? In other words, how can a “cultural reorientation” of informal norms away from accepting and justifying corruption be accomplished and how to translate this anti-corruption ethos into formal governance (Bamidele et al, 2016, p. 121; Ganie-Rochman & Achwan, 2016, p. 174)? Is it possible to generate enough momentum for change within an unwieldy dysfunctional system, before the degree of dysfunctionality reaches a breaking point (a process that may take many years)?…”

The Impact of the Declining Pancasila Democracy in the Post- Indonesia Reformation

“…The weak parties' performances result in the candidates stuck in a vicious circle of political recompense. This drives the parties' candidates who sit in the parliament are caught in various cases of corruption, bribery and abuse of power [16]. To meet the high cost of elections and to run the activities of political parties, they get forced to look for illicit funds.…”

Production of Social Science in Indonesia: An Incomplete Reform From Above

“…In an ideal typical situation, institutional change can be driven from above by introducing new structural elements (formal rules) such as laws and regulations. The best formal rules usually reflect social values and norms that operate in society (Ganie‐Rochman & Achwan, ). This new macrostructure shapes structures and actions at lower levels.…”