2017
DOI: 10.24131/3724.170503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption in schools? The scale and sources of corruption perceptions in Poland

Abstract: This paper analyses the scale and sources of views on the prevalence of corruption in the education sector in Poland. Through the use of public opinion surveys, I answer questions on how the corruption level in Polish educational institutions has changed over time and how it compares to other public institutions (such as the health care sector and police) and to the situation in other European countries. My goal is to investigate the effect of individual-level predictors of perceiving schools as corrupt in Pol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…contagion effect; Lee and Guven, 2013;Zaloznaya et al, 2018), and (3) the two are not related (or weakly related) since they measure different corruption forms (the weak relation observed by Mocan, 2008). These scenarios are not mutually exclusive and may occur together (Wysmułek, 2017). This article takes the position that corruption perception is informed by experience but may also be related to certain external factors.…”
Section: Corruption Perception Versus Bribe-giving Experience Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…contagion effect; Lee and Guven, 2013;Zaloznaya et al, 2018), and (3) the two are not related (or weakly related) since they measure different corruption forms (the weak relation observed by Mocan, 2008). These scenarios are not mutually exclusive and may occur together (Wysmułek, 2017). This article takes the position that corruption perception is informed by experience but may also be related to certain external factors.…”
Section: Corruption Perception Versus Bribe-giving Experience Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this view, corruption perception and experience would “share” some determinants, while others could be outcome specific. However, some scholars argue that perception indicators are not informed by experience alone and that they are “biased” by certain individual and country characteristics (Charron, 2016; Mocan, 2008; Wysmułek, 2017). If so, the relation between them should be weaker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%