2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical activation in hemianopia after stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alterations in down-stream, higher cortical areas, not directly affected by the lesion, were already demonstrated by gene expression studies [42] and single-unit recordings in animal models [43,44], as well as MEG [45] and fMRI studies in humans [20,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. This is in line with findings from motor [53,54] and attentional systems [55] where lesion-induced network modifications have been increasingly recognized and appreciated.…”
Section: Global Effect Of Visual System Lesionssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Alterations in down-stream, higher cortical areas, not directly affected by the lesion, were already demonstrated by gene expression studies [42] and single-unit recordings in animal models [43,44], as well as MEG [45] and fMRI studies in humans [20,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. This is in line with findings from motor [53,54] and attentional systems [55] where lesion-induced network modifications have been increasingly recognized and appreciated.…”
Section: Global Effect Of Visual System Lesionssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It has been already shown that synchronization evoked by a stimulus presented in the seeing field of hemianopia patients is compromised (Schadow et al, 2009) and that different neural networks are activated during visual tasks in hemianopia subjects than in healthy controls (Perez et al, 2012). We hypothesize that lesion-induced disturbance of interhemispheric interactions might be the key mechanism, as in the lesioned hemisphere visually induced activation is weaker (Goebel et al, 2001; Nelles et al, 2007) and delayed (Rossion et al, 2000; Schoenfeld et al, 2002) when compared to the uninjured hemisphere. Reduced and delayed activation in the lesioned hemispheres might hamper the interhemispheric functional connectivity and consequently synchronization in the uninjured hemisphere (Schadow et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been shown that the visual cortex lesion affects activity and connectivity of down-stream visual structures (Goebel et al, 2001; Schoenfeld et al, 2002; Nelles et al, 2007). Crucially, unilateral cortical lesions alter activity of visual cortical areas not only in the damaged, but also in the seemingly unaffected (uninjured) hemisphere, which has been shown in animal model (Rushmore and Payne, 2003) and in patients (Henriksson et al, 2007; Nelles et al, 2007). Changes in activity are related to modification of anatomical (Bridge et al, 2008) and functional connectivity (Silvanto et al, 2009) between both hemispheres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicated before and after training that ME using the affected and unaffected hand activated the contralateral SMC area. In patients with stroke, the activation intensity of the contralateral SMC was positively correlated with improvement in motor function [16, 32, 38]. Our results demonstrated that ME using the affected hand increased the number of voxels activated in the contralateral SMC and was associated with better motor recovery of hand function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A stroke in this area is associated with varying degrees of dyskinesia [32]. The NDT-bobath therapy is a prominent method used for rehabilitation training after stroke [33], and it may work by promoting plasticity in the central nervous system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%