2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical connectivity in fronto-temporal focal epilepsy from EEG analysis: A study via graph theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Event-related potentials ( Figure 4a ) after substitutive electrical (n = 4, estimated power 0.75, Figure 4—figure supplement 2 ) and natural mechanical stimulation (n = 4, estimated power 0.79, Figure 4—figure supplement 3 ) conditions did not reveal any statistical difference (Montecarlo statistics with cluster correction for multiple comparisons). Furthermore, a network graph analysis approach ( Vecchio et al, 2015a ) revealed a lateralized EEG frequency modulation that was evoked both by electrical and mechanical stimuli ( Figure 4b ). Indeed, the primary sensorimotor areas in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulus presented a significant reduction (3-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test, F(1,6) = 6.48, p<0.05, comparison to the ipsilateral hemisphere) in the clustering coefficient following the incoming sensory stimulus, regardless of its tactile or substitutive nature ( Figure 4c ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event-related potentials ( Figure 4a ) after substitutive electrical (n = 4, estimated power 0.75, Figure 4—figure supplement 2 ) and natural mechanical stimulation (n = 4, estimated power 0.79, Figure 4—figure supplement 3 ) conditions did not reveal any statistical difference (Montecarlo statistics with cluster correction for multiple comparisons). Furthermore, a network graph analysis approach ( Vecchio et al, 2015a ) revealed a lateralized EEG frequency modulation that was evoked both by electrical and mechanical stimuli ( Figure 4b ). Indeed, the primary sensorimotor areas in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulus presented a significant reduction (3-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test, F(1,6) = 6.48, p<0.05, comparison to the ipsilateral hemisphere) in the clustering coefficient following the incoming sensory stimulus, regardless of its tactile or substitutive nature ( Figure 4c ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected four methods that have been widely used to estimate functional brain connectivity from electrophysiological signals (local field potentials, depth-EEG or EEG/MEG) (see (Wendling et al 2009) for review). These measures were chosen to cover the main families of connectivity methods (linear and nonlinear regression, phase synchronization and mutual information).…”
Section: B Connectivity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous cognitive studies (Astolfi et al 2007;Babiloni et al 2005;Betti et al 2013;Bola and Sabel 2015;David et al 2003;David et al 2002;de Pasquale et al 2010;Hassan et al 2015a;Hassan et al 2014;Hassan and Wendling 2015;Hipp et al 2011;Hoechstetter et al 2004;Liljeström et al 2015;Schoffelen and Gross 2009), the basic principle is to estimate functional connectivity at the level of brain sources reconstructed from scalp signals. These methods, referred to as "source connectivity" were applied to both interictal EEG (Coito et al 2015;Song et al 2013;Vecchio et al 2014) and MEG signals (Dai et al 2012;Malinowska et al 2014) as well as to EEG signals recorded during seizures (Ding et al 2007;Jiruska et al 2013;Lu et al 2012) or resting states (Adebimpe et al 2016;Coito et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research groups (Sporns and Zwi, 2004, Stam and Reijneveld, 2007, De Vico et al, 2007, He et al, 2007, de Haan et al, 2009a, Rubinov and Sporns, 2010, Vecchio et al, 2014a, Vecchio et al, 2015b, Miraglia et al, 2017) have recently engaged themselves with brain functional dataset analysis by graph theory applications. These applications are made with different methodological approaches and on different kinds of datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%