2005
DOI: 10.1080/08990220500084636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical control for mastication in cats: Changes in masticatory movements following lesions in the masticatory cortex

Abstract: In a previous paper (Hiraba and Sato 2004) we reported that an accurate mastication might be executed by the cortical processing in bilateral masticatory area (MA)and motor cortices. The aim of this study was to determine if cats with lesion of either unilateral or bilateral MA showed changes in mastication. After exploring mechanoreceptive fields and motor effects of mastication-related neurons (MRNs) in MA using the single unit recording and intracortical microstimulation methods, we made various lesions in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed descriptions of most of the methods have already been published (Hiraba et al 1997(Hiraba et al , 2000Hiraba 2004;Hiraba and Sato 2004, 2005b, 2005c and so the following descriptions focus on new methodological approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed descriptions of most of the methods have already been published (Hiraba et al 1997(Hiraba et al , 2000Hiraba 2004;Hiraba and Sato 2004, 2005b, 2005c and so the following descriptions focus on new methodological approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor Cx: the motor cortex. Summary of collected data from orofacial SI in Hiraba et al (2000), MA in Hiraba and Sato (2005). food, prolongation of the masticatory and food intake period recovered, but abnormal wide jaw-opening and tongue protrusion did not. On the other hand, rhythms of mastication and swallowing remained normal in the same way as cats with the lesions into orofacial SI (orofacial region of the first somatosensory cortex) and MA, as shown in our previous studies (Hiraba et al 1999(Hiraba et al , 2000.…”
Section: Mastication After Area P Lesionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We indicated these deficits in the early phase in Table II. Table II summarized deficits of various cats with orofacial SI lesion (Hiraba et al 2000), MA lesion (Hiraba and Sato 2005) and area P. Namely, the decrease of food intake rate, delay of masticatory start, dropping of 1 Decreased food intake rate þ À À þ þ 2 Delay of masticatory start þ À À þ þ 3 Dropping of food þ À À þ þ 4 Contralateral whisker hairs no-erection þ À À À À 5 Prolongation of masticatory and food intake period À þ þ þ þ 6 Abnormal tongue protrusion À À þ þ þ 7 Abnormal tongue protrusion À À À À þ 8 Rhythms of mastication and swallow À À À À À Plus (+) and minus (À) indicate appeared deficits and no changes in masticatory behaviors, respectively. Orofacial SI: the orofacial region of the primary somatosensory cortex.…”
Section: Mastication After Area P Lesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies performed with rabbits have shown that after bilateral cortical masticatory area (CMA) ablation, the animal cannot manipulate food placed in the front of the mouth for several days, with a following partial recovery [20] , while repetitive stimulation of the CMA (which has projections to the ventral region of the putamen) elicits rhythmic jaw movements [21,22] . While cats with unilateral lesion of the CMA showed no changes in mastication except for prolongation of the food intake and masticatory periods, cats with bilateral CMA lesions showed wide jaw opening during mastication, delay in the 278 start of mastication, abnormal tongue protrusion and difficulty in manipulating food on the tongue [23,24] . Kempainen et al [25] performed a study in patients with unilateral cortical infarction in the region of the middle cerebral artery and showed no impairment of masticatory force and function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%