2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical excitability and the shape of the haemodynamic response

Abstract: Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of the haemodynamic response can reflect cortical excitation and can reveal underlying cortical physiology. Here, we show differences in the shape of the haemodynamic response that are dependent on stimulus parameters. Two sets of visual stimuli were used varying in parameters that are known to manipulate the haemodynamic response in the visual cortex. We measured the oxyhaemoglobin response using near infrared spectroscopy. The first set of stimuli comprised chr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, during a simple multisensory detection task, SP exhibited abnormal PSU after normal task‐related activation in secondary unisensory areas, as well as abnormal task‐induced deactivation in the aDMN, and the two hemodynamic abnormalities were related. Current results are consistent with the view that separate neural processes underlie the two phases of the HRF [Haigh et al, ; Mullinger et al, ; Sadaghiani et al, ] and that they are differentially affected in SP. Such findings do not directly contradict the large body of literature on evoked BOLD responses in SP that used a single parameter to estimate the HRF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, during a simple multisensory detection task, SP exhibited abnormal PSU after normal task‐related activation in secondary unisensory areas, as well as abnormal task‐induced deactivation in the aDMN, and the two hemodynamic abnormalities were related. Current results are consistent with the view that separate neural processes underlie the two phases of the HRF [Haigh et al, ; Mullinger et al, ; Sadaghiani et al, ] and that they are differentially affected in SP. Such findings do not directly contradict the large body of literature on evoked BOLD responses in SP that used a single parameter to estimate the HRF.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Collectively, current results are consistent with the view that separate neural processes underlie the two phases of the HRF [Haigh et al, ; Mullinger et al, ; Sadaghiani et al, ], and that they are differentially affected in SP (Supporting Information Fig. S1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The increase in visual discomfort with larger chromaticity separations replicated previous findings, 21 which demonstrated that, regardless of the color pairs used, chromaticity separation accounted for the majority of the variance in visual discomfort ratings. Similarly, larger neural responses to larger chromaticity separations is consistent with previous reports of increased hemodynamic responses 21,28 and greater alpha suppression 20 in visual cortex. Together, this suggests that the visual system is sensitive to chrominance as well as luminance, and that greater chrominance produces a large neural response which is consistent with increasing cortical excitation.…”
Section: Large and Large Chromaticity Separations For Individuals Wisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…If this is true, uncomfortable stimuli should produce an increased response compared to comfortable stimuli. There is evidence that discomfort from gratings is related to the haemodynamic brain response, for both black and white (Coutts et al ., ) and chromatic gratings (Haigh et al ., , ). There is also some evidence for increased visual evoked potentials on viewing black‐and‐white riloid stimuli: stimuli that were most comfortable were also those with a lower event‐related potential (ERP) response amplitude, specifically the P100 response (O'Hare et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%