1988
DOI: 10.1016/0160-2896(88)90016-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

52
285
5
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 618 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
52
285
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result suggests that for younger adults, cognitively high performing subjects may be able to process novelty more efficiently, thus appropriating fewer resources than cognitively average performing subjects (Haier et al, 1988;McGarry-Roberts et al, 1992). Consistent with this notion are studies that have shown that young subjects with greater intellectual capacity generate smaller target P3 amplitudes (Egan et al, 1994;McGarry-Roberts et al, 1992); however, this has not been an invariant finding (e.g., Jausovec and Jausovec, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This result suggests that for younger adults, cognitively high performing subjects may be able to process novelty more efficiently, thus appropriating fewer resources than cognitively average performing subjects (Haier et al, 1988;McGarry-Roberts et al, 1992). Consistent with this notion are studies that have shown that young subjects with greater intellectual capacity generate smaller target P3 amplitudes (Egan et al, 1994;McGarry-Roberts et al, 1992); however, this has not been an invariant finding (e.g., Jausovec and Jausovec, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Ability-dependent differences in cortical activity during cognitive processing have been repeatedly reported, with poor performers showing increased cortical activity during task solving (Haier et al, 1988;Lamm et al, 1999). In order to exclude the confounding effects of such individual differences, potential participants were pretested using a standardized three-dimensional cube comparison test (3DC; Gittler, 1990).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zuckerman, 1991). Haier et al (1988) did not find significant differences in absolute cerebral metabolic rate for glucose between three levels of task complexity. Several localized regions of the brain showed more activity when subjects worked through the complex Raven's Progressive Matrices test than when doing a visual search task (i.e., pressing a key whenever 'O' appeared on the computer screen, or simply attending to a changing series of digits without responding).…”
Section: Neural Efficiency Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 89%