2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical layer-dependent BOLD and CBV responses measured by spin-echo and gradient-echo fMRI: Insights into hemodynamic regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
266
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
40
266
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to estimate the relative CBV change from the VASO signal change, a value of CBV rest needs to be assumed (usually 5.5%) . Although microvascular CBV rest is relatively homogeneously distributed across layers (Kim et al, 2013;Weber et al, 2008), when macrovasculature is also included the total CBV rest was found to be largest at the cortical surface, decreasing with cortical depth (Kennerley et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2006). Higher CBV rest at the cortical surface is associated with a smaller relative ΔCBV for the same VASO signal change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In order to estimate the relative CBV change from the VASO signal change, a value of CBV rest needs to be assumed (usually 5.5%) . Although microvascular CBV rest is relatively homogeneously distributed across layers (Kim et al, 2013;Weber et al, 2008), when macrovasculature is also included the total CBV rest was found to be largest at the cortical surface, decreasing with cortical depth (Kennerley et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2006). Higher CBV rest at the cortical surface is associated with a smaller relative ΔCBV for the same VASO signal change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4D in (Kennerley et al, 2005) and Fig. 3A in (Zhao et al, 2006), respectively). When laminarindependent homogeneous baseline CBV is assumed, the baseline CBV in surface voxels is underestimated and thus, the relative CBV change calculated from VASO signal change is overestimated.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sensitivity gain of the CBV measurement over the BOLD technique is dependent on the dose of the contrast agent, the imaging parameters, and the magnetic field. When 5-15 mg iron/kg body weight is used, the sensitivity gain is about 1.3 to 5-fold (Mandeville et al, 1998;Mandeville et al, 2001;Kim and Ugurbil, 2003;Zhao et al, 2006).…”
Section: Sensitivity and Specificity Of Hemodynamic-based Fmrimentioning
confidence: 99%