2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical Representations of Visual Stimuli Shift Locations with Changes in Memory States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One intriguing possibility is that these representations are prioritized according to biased competition ( Desimone, 1998 ; Hutchinson et al, 2016 ), leading to preferential routing and subsequent encoding of predicted, but not perceived, information in the hippocampus. Relatedly, recent work had found that encoding vs. retrieval states are associated with distinct patterns of activity in visual cortex ( Long and Kuhl, 2021 ), suggesting that representations in visual regions may be fundamentally shaped by memory state in the hippocampus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One intriguing possibility is that these representations are prioritized according to biased competition ( Desimone, 1998 ; Hutchinson et al, 2016 ), leading to preferential routing and subsequent encoding of predicted, but not perceived, information in the hippocampus. Relatedly, recent work had found that encoding vs. retrieval states are associated with distinct patterns of activity in visual cortex ( Long and Kuhl, 2021 ), suggesting that representations in visual regions may be fundamentally shaped by memory state in the hippocampus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed earlier, a wider network of regions beyond the hippocampus have been implicated in memoryguided predictions and contextual reactivations (Bar and Aminoff, 2003;Lee and Kuhl, 2016;Livne and Bar, 2016;Jonker et al, 2018;Caplette et al, 2020;Long and Kuhl, 2021). The PM network is functionally connected to the posterior hippocampus, and associated with reactivation of contextuallyrelevant object information, whilst the AT network is connected to the anterior hippocampus and is thought to represent item information (Ranganath and Ritchey, 2012).…”
Section: Item and Expectation Effects In The Posterior Medial Cortexmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We further identified differences in the pattern of activation between first encoding and recognition. Differences between encoding and retrieval have been previously observed in mean activity (Cabeza & Nyberg, 2000;Daselaar et al, 2009), functional connectivity (Huijbers et al, 2011;Simons & Spiers, 2003), and object representations (Long & Kuhl, 2021). These discrepancies may reflect differences in the utility of the tasks (Simons & Spiers, 2003) or in differences in orienting attention between the memory stages (Chun & Turk-Browne, 2007;Wagner et al, 2005), which may be represented in neural activity leading to differential manifestations of neural dedifferentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%