2015
DOI: 10.1177/1550059415581708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical Suppression to Delayed Self-Initiated Auditory Stimuli in Schizotypy

Abstract: Schizophrenia patients have been shown to exhibit subnormal levels of electrophysiological suppression to self-initiated, button press elicited sounds. These self-suppression deficits have been shown to improve following the imposition of a subsecond delay between the button press and the evoked sound. The current study aimed to investigate whether nonclinical individuals who scored highly on the personality dimension of schizotypy would exhibit similar patterns of self-suppression abnormalities to those exhib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that deficits in suppression of theta ITC may be a biomarker of schizophrenia, while deficits in N1-suppression may be a biomarker of more general psychosis vulnerability; it is apparent in patients with schizophrenia (Ford et al, 2007a, Ford et al, 2001c, Ford et al, 2013, Ford et al, 2007b), psychotic bipolar patients (Ford et al, 2013), patients with schizoaffective disorder (Ford et al, 2013), non-help-seeking people with schizotypy (Oestreich et al, 2016), CHR samples (Mathalon et al, 2018), and it is reduced at intermediate levels in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia, psychotic bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder (Ford et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suggest that deficits in suppression of theta ITC may be a biomarker of schizophrenia, while deficits in N1-suppression may be a biomarker of more general psychosis vulnerability; it is apparent in patients with schizophrenia (Ford et al, 2007a, Ford et al, 2001c, Ford et al, 2013, Ford et al, 2007b), psychotic bipolar patients (Ford et al, 2013), patients with schizoaffective disorder (Ford et al, 2013), non-help-seeking people with schizotypy (Oestreich et al, 2016), CHR samples (Mathalon et al, 2018), and it is reduced at intermediate levels in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia, psychotic bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder (Ford et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Importantly, this effect is disrupted in people with schizophrenia (Ford et al, 2013, Ford et al, 2007a, Ford et al, 2001a, Ford et al, 2001b, Ford et al, 2007b, Ford et al, 2010, Heinks-Maldonado et al, 2007), bipolar disorder (Ford et al, 2013), schizotypy (Oestreich et al, 2016), and in people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis (Mathalon et al, 2018). In first-degree relatives of people with schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder, suppression values are intermediate between healthy controls and ill probands (Ford et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, healthy controls may experience mild schizotypal symptoms which do not warrant clinical diagnosis, but suggest a ‘continuum of psychosis’ (Oestreich et al, 2016). In keeping with this idea, in a study by Light and Braff (2005), links have previously been made between MMN and GAF scores in schizophrenia patients using individual EEG sites and a duration stimulus paradigm, with a correlation of 65% that accounted for 42% of the total variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals at high-risk for developing a psychotic disorder exhibit auditory attenuation that is intermediate between healthy participants and patients with schizophrenia (Perez et al, 2012). Moreover, healthy individuals with psychotic-like experiences show less auditory attenuation compared to healthy individuals without psychotic-like experiences (Oestreich et al, 2015(Oestreich et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%