Regarding Nishibayashi et al, 1 a description of human pallidal neuronal responses to cortical stimulation, there are 2 sets of concerns. First, the latencies of 22 ms are far longer than reported elsewhere in laboratory animals, as noted by the authors. Their explanation of longer conduction times based on larger human brain sizes is improbable. Their latencies are far longer than those reported in human studies as well. Thalamic neuronal responses latencies to globus pallidus interna (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) are approximately 3.5 ms. The range of latencies of GPi responses to STN DBS in the study by Reese et al 3 is much faster than antidromic responses described above. Stimulus artifact could obscure earlier extracellular antidromic potentials in the other studies; however, intracellular recordings in cortical neurons to STN stimulation show latencies on the order of 2 6 0.5 ms in the rodent. 5 Rather, the response reported by Reese et al 3 probably represents reentrant activities from DBS pulses earlier than the immediately preceding DBS pulse. The actual latencies probably ranged from n*5.6 þ 0.265 ms to n*5.6 þ 1 ms, where n is some integer and 5.6 ms is the interstimulus interval of 180 pps DBS. This is relevant, as the responses described by Nishibayashi et al 1 could reflect later reentrant activity in the basal ganglia-thalamic-cortical system, which is very different from the presumption of an open-loop feed-forward mechanism by Nishibayashi et al. The second concern relates to the attribution of the sequential changes in neuronal activities to excitation, then inhibition and then excitation from which they inferred a sequence of orthodromic influences. This is an unwarranted conclusion as there are alternatives that cannot be excluded based on the data presented. These alternatives include refractory periods reducing neuronal activity following excitation and a post-refractory period of increased excitability producing increased neuronal activity following the reduction.2 At the least, alternatives should be considered.