SUMMARY:In patients with ALS, conventional MR imaging is frequently noninformative, and its use has been restricted to excluding other conditions that can mimic ALS. Conversely, the extensive application of modern MR imagingϪbased techniques to the study of ALS has undoubtedly improved our understanding of disease pathophysiology and is likely to have a role in the identification of potential biomarkers of disease progression. This review summarizes how new MR imaging technology is changing dramatically our understanding of the factors associated with ALS evolution and highlights the reasons why it should be used more extensively in studies of disease progression, including clinical trials.ABBREVIATIONS: ALS ϭ amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS ϭ ALS Functional Rating Scale; Cho ϭ choline; Cr ϭ creatine; CST ϭ corticospinal tract; DTI ϭ diffusion tensor imaging; FA ϭ fractional anisotropy; FLAIR ϭ fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; fMRI ϭ functional MR imaging; FTD ϭ frontotemporal dementia; FUS/TLS ϭ fused in sarcoma/translocated in liposarcoma gene; GM ϭ gray matter; 1 H-MR spectroscopy ϭ proton MR spectroscopy; L ϭ left; LMN ϭ lower motor neuron; MD ϭ mean diffusivity; mIns ϭ myo-inositol; MT ϭ magnetization transfer; MTR ϭ MT ratio; NAA ϭ N-acetylaspartate; ns ϭ not significant; PD ϭ proton density; R ϭ right; SOD1 ϭ superoxide dismutase 1; SPM ϭ statistical parametric mapping; TDP-43 ϭ TAR DNA-binding protein gene; UMN ϭ upper motor neuron; VBM ϭ voxel-based morphometry; WM ϭ white matter A LS, also known as motor neuron disease, is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a progressive muscular paralysis reflecting degeneration of motor neurons in the primary motor cortex, brain stem, and spinal cord. The phenotypic expression of ALS is highly heterogeneous and determined by 4 elements: 1) body region of onset, 2) relative mix of UMN and LMN involvement, 3) rate of progression, and 4) cognitive impairment.1 In approximately 5%-10% of patients, the disease is inherited; 20% of these individuals have a mutation of the SOD1 gene; approximately 2%-5%, of the TARDBP (TDP-43) gene; and 2%-4%, of the FUS/TLS gene.
2Most patients with ALS, however, have no obvious family history and have sporadic ALS.2 To date, the only specific marker of sporadic ALS is the presence of inclusions staining positively for ubiquitin and TDP-43 in degenerating motor neurons.
3Despite technical advances in medicine in the last century, the diagnosis of sporadic ALS relies on the interpretation of clinical symptoms and signs (ie, signs suggestive of combined UMN and LMN degeneration, together with disease progression compatible with a neurodegenerative disorder). Paraclinical and laboratory tests are used only to exclude "ALS-mimic" syndromes. 4,5 In ALS, the absence of a disease marker for UMN and LMN involvement has 2 main negative consequences. First, the delay from onset of the disease to diagnosis of ALS can vary between 13 and 18 months 6,7