Corticosteroid Receptor Involvement in the Stress Response

Kloet, E. Ronald de; DeRijk, Roel H.; Meijer, Onno C.

doi:10.1002/9781118083222.ch3

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 125 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Bisconti, Bergeman, & Boker, 2004; de Kloet, Derijk, & Meijer, 2011). By contrast, chronically stressful and aversive circumstances tend to produce more enduring patterns of variability and tend to lead to more enduring changes in a wide range of psychological and physiological functions (de Kloet et al., 2011; Offidani & Ruini, 2012). Assessments of overall adaptation in chronically stressful circumstances are necessarily relative, tempered by time and changing context, and in such circumstances, the distinction between resilience and maladjustment is often not fully apparent until after the stressful context has, to some degree, abated (Masten & Narayan, 2012).…”

Section: Developmental Origins and Conceptual Migrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Aspects of panel 1A were adapted specifically from Masten and Narayan (2012) and aspects of panel 1B were adapted from Bonanno (2004Bonanno ( ) doi:10.1111 Annual Research Review -Positive adjustment to adversity stressors typically produce transient perturbations in normal adjustment and functioning (e.g. Bisconti, Bergeman, & Boker, 2004;de Kloet, Derijk, & Meijer, 2011). By contrast, chronically stressful and aversive circumstances tend to produce more enduring patterns of variability and tend to lead to more enduring changes in a wide range of psychological and physiological functions (de Kloet et al, 2011;Offidani & Ruini, 2012).…”

Section: Emergent Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Annual Research Review: Positive adjustment to adversity – trajectories of minimal–impact resilience and emergent resilience

Bonanno

Diminich

2012

Child Psychology Psychiatry

536

457

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Research on resilience in the aftermath of potentially traumatic life events is still evolving. For decades researchers have documented resilience in children exposed to corrosive early environments, such as poverty or chronic maltreatment. Relatively more recently the study of resilience has migrated to the investigation of isolated and potentially traumatic life events (PTE) in adults. Methods In this article we first consider some of the key differences in the conceptualization of resilience following chronic adversity versus resilience following single-incident traumas, and then describe some of the misunderstandings that have developed about these constructs. To organize our discussion we introduce the terms emergent resilience and minimal-impact resilience to represent trajectories positive adjustment in these two domains, respectively. Results We focused in particular on minimal-impact resilience, and reviewed recent advances in statistical modeling of latent trajectories that have informed the most recent research on minimal-impact resilience in both children and adults and the variables that predict it, including demographic variables, exposure, past and current stressors, resources, personality, positive emotion, coping and appraisal, and flexibility in coping and emotion regulation. Conclusions The research on minimal impact resilience is nascent. Further research is warranted with implications for a multiple levels of analysis approach to elucidate the processes that may mitigate or modify the impact of a PTE at different developmental stages.

show abstract

Section: Developmental Origins and Conceptual Migrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Emergent Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

Annual Research Review: Positive adjustment to adversity – trajectories of minimal–impact resilience and emergent resilience

Bonanno

Diminich

2012

Child Psychology Psychiatry

536

457

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These two modes of action constitute the basic hormonal response to stress in mammals, which concludes with the secretion of glucocorticoids (GC) and catecholamines (CAs) into the blood flow (Strtakis & Chrousos, 1995;Tafet and Bernardini, 2003). GC and CA are the mechanism of defense for mammals in threatening situations that promote behavioral, metabolic, and physiological changes (Clow, Hucklebridge, & Evans, 1998;De Kloet, Meijer, & Van Haarst, 1998;Strtakis & Chrousos, 1995;Tafet & Bernardini, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Amitriptyline Treatment Under Chronic Stress Conditions: Effect on Circulating Catecholamines and Anxiety in Early Maternally Separated Rats

Cotella

Lascano

Levin

et al. 2009

International Journal of Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this work was to determine the effect of amitriptyline (AMI) on peripheral outcomes such as plasma epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) concentration and anxiety-like behavior displayed in the plus maze test in adult male Wistar rats under variable chronic stress and daily oral administration of AMI (5 mg/kg). Animals were previously isolated from the mother for 4.5 hr every day for the first 3 weeks of life. Administration of the antidepressant AMI reduced anxiety-like behavior in animals submitted only to chronic stress but not in early maternally separated (MS) subjects or in animals subjected to the two types of stresses.

show abstract

Resilience

Diminich¹,

Bonanno²

2015

Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on resilience is still evolving. For decades, developmental researchers have documented resilient outcomes in children exposed to chronic maltreatment who nonetheless thrived. Relatively more recently the study of resilience has migrated to the investigation of acute and potentially traumatic life events (PTE) in adults. We first consider some of the key differences in the conceptualization of resilience following chronic adversity versus resilience following single‐incident traumas, and then describe some of the misunderstandings that have developed about these constructs. We describe the terms emergent resilience and minimal‐impact resilience (Bonanno & Diminich, 2013) to represent trajectories of positive adjustment in these two domains, respectively. In particular, we focus on minimal‐impact resilience, and review recent advances in the literature. We then briefly discuss the most widely researched factors (e.g., age, gender, personality) suggested to influence resilient outcomes following exposure to PTEs. In closing, we suggest future areas of research to further expand the study of resilience within the social sciences.

show abstract

Corticosteroid Receptor Involvement in the Stress Response

Cited by 5 publications

References 125 publications

Annual Research Review: Positive adjustment to adversity – trajectories of minimal–impact resilience and emergent resilience

Annual Research Review: Positive adjustment to adversity – trajectories of minimal–impact resilience and emergent resilience

Amitriptyline Treatment Under Chronic Stress Conditions: Effect on Circulating Catecholamines and Anxiety in Early Maternally Separated Rats

Resilience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About