2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corticostriatal response selection in sentence production: Insights from neural network simulation with reservoir computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the earliest, most influential connectionist models of memory (McClelland and Rumelhart, 1985), for example, was able to account for basic differences in repetition priming of spoken words and pseudowords (a word being represented as a distributed pattern of activity across a layer of units). Nowadays, a new generation of large-scale neural-network models are being increasingly used in the study of memory and language processes (e.g., Wennekers et al, 2006; Herman et al, 2013; Pulvermüller and Garagnani, 2014; Hinaut et al, 2015; Rolls and Deco, 2015), which are able to elucidate the underlying brain mechanisms on the basis of neurobiologically realistic learning and anatomical connectivity, and explain neuroimaging data (Husain et al, 2004; Pulvermüller et al, 2014; Garagnani and Pulvermüller, 2016). However, to date, a neuromechanistic account directly linking the different high-frequency neurophysiological responses induced by familiar word and unknown pseudoword stimuli to corresponding differential oscillatory behavior of underlying large-scale neuronal populations is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest, most influential connectionist models of memory (McClelland and Rumelhart, 1985), for example, was able to account for basic differences in repetition priming of spoken words and pseudowords (a word being represented as a distributed pattern of activity across a layer of units). Nowadays, a new generation of large-scale neural-network models are being increasingly used in the study of memory and language processes (e.g., Wennekers et al, 2006; Herman et al, 2013; Pulvermüller and Garagnani, 2014; Hinaut et al, 2015; Rolls and Deco, 2015), which are able to elucidate the underlying brain mechanisms on the basis of neurobiologically realistic learning and anatomical connectivity, and explain neuroimaging data (Husain et al, 2004; Pulvermüller et al, 2014; Garagnani and Pulvermüller, 2016). However, to date, a neuromechanistic account directly linking the different high-frequency neurophysiological responses induced by familiar word and unknown pseudoword stimuli to corresponding differential oscillatory behavior of underlying large-scale neuronal populations is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…outputs) are trained to linearly extract information from the high-dimensional non-linear dynamics of the reservoir. Several authors have taken advantage of this paradigm to model cortical areas such as PFC 42,43,44,45 because most of the connections are not trained, especially the recurrrent ones. Another reason to use reservoir for PFC modelling is because PFC also hosts high-dimensional non-linear dynamics [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, within our larger iCub framework, recurrent “reservoir” networks based on cortico-striatal neuroanatomy provided a learning capability for comprehension of grammatical constructions in the service of cooperative interaction (Hinaut and Dominey, 2013; Hinaut et al, 2014, 2015). The use of a mental work space (that we refer to as the OPC) allows the contents of the ABM in the form of action rules to be used to predict the outcome of one's own and other's actions and beliefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of the studies reviewed below, the answer to this question is specified by the architecture in Figure 2. That is, the robot has a perceptual system to observe actions and a motor system to perform actions (Lallée et al, 2011), a language system to understand and produce simple language related to action (Dominey and Boucher, 2005b; Hinaut and Dominey, 2013; Hinaut et al, 2014, 2015), and the ABM infrastructure described above. While these are minimal requirements, one can also consider that these could be embedded as part of a more complete system (Lallee and Verschure, 2015).…”
Section: Toward Neisser's Four Levels Of Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%