2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-011-2933-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmetic and functional outcome after stoma site skin closure in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The POSAS was introduced in 2004 and aims to measure the quality of scar tissue through a patient and observer module. The questionnaire has previously been used as a proxy model to describe scars in children [16,17]. No observer evaluation of the physical appearance could be performed due to lack of ethical approval, and consequently only the patient module was used.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The POSAS was introduced in 2004 and aims to measure the quality of scar tissue through a patient and observer module. The questionnaire has previously been used as a proxy model to describe scars in children [16,17]. No observer evaluation of the physical appearance could be performed due to lack of ethical approval, and consequently only the patient module was used.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, two systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown that PSC significantly reduces the risk of SSI compared to traditional LSC [ 11 , 15 ]. Some reports have also noted improvements in aesthetic outcomes [ 16 ]. On the other hand, PSC requires daily wound cleaning and takes longer until complete wound closure [ 17 ], which are its disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the non-umbilical stoma group, the wound edges may be di cult to t because we skin suturing during stoma closure used purse-string skin sutures in many cases. But pursestring skin sutures haves been reported to have less surgical site infections [25], shorter wound length [26], and better cosmetic results [27] compared with straight closures, so we chose that method. The at abdominal wall or the depressed umbilical region may have had the greatest in uence on the results, but the possibility of bias, as described above, remains an issue for further investigation, including the expansion of this technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%