2017
DOI: 10.1101/238592
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CosMIC: A Consistent Metric for Spike Inference from Calcium Imaging

Abstract: In recent years, the development of algorithms to detect neuronal spiking activity from two-photon calcium imaging data has received much attention. Meanwhile, few researchers have examined the metrics used to assess the similarity of detected spike trains with the ground truth. We highlight the limitations of the two most commonly used metrics, the spike train correlation and success rate, and propose an alternative, which we refer to as CosMIC. Rather than operating on the true and estimated spike trains dir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best-fit parameters depend strongly on how we evaluate the match between true and inferred spike trains. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the true and inferred spike train is a common choice (Brown et al, 2004; Paiva et al, 2010; Theis et al, 2016; Reynolds et al, 2018; Berens et al, 2018), typically with both trains convolved with a Gaussian kernel to allow for timing errors. However, we find that choosing parameters to maximise the correlation coefficient can create notable errors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best-fit parameters depend strongly on how we evaluate the match between true and inferred spike trains. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the true and inferred spike train is a common choice (Brown et al, 2004; Paiva et al, 2010; Theis et al, 2016; Reynolds et al, 2018; Berens et al, 2018), typically with both trains convolved with a Gaussian kernel to allow for timing errors. However, we find that choosing parameters to maximise the correlation coefficient can create notable errors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the Error Rate metric (Deneux et al, 2016; Victor and Purpura, 1996) resulted in excellent recovery of ground-truth spike trains. Other recently developed methods for comparing spike-trains based on information theory (Theis et al, 2016) or fuzzy set theory (Reynolds et al, 2018), may also be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F 1 -scores combine false positives and negatives 11 but are difficult to compare across datasets when the baseline spike rates vary (which is the case for our database). Other metrics try to combine the strengths of the correlation measure with a sensitivity to the correct number of spikes 78 but are less intuitive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%