2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic ray contribution in the WMAP of the cosmic microwave background

Abstract: We have updated our analysis of the 9-year WMAP data using the collection of polarization maps looking for the presence of additional evidence for a finite 'cosmic ray foreground' for the CMB.We have given special attention to high Galactic latitudes, where the recent BICEP2 findings were reported. The method of examining the correlation with the observed gamma ray flux proposed in our earlier papers and applied to the polarization data shows that the foreground related to cosmic rays is still observed even at… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This correlation coefficient is computed outside a galactic mask. A cross-correlation analysis of CMB data with external data sets was already used in the literature in a variety of ways, for example, in Afshordi, Loh & Strauss (2004) Wibig & Wolfendale (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This correlation coefficient is computed outside a galactic mask. A cross-correlation analysis of CMB data with external data sets was already used in the literature in a variety of ways, for example, in Afshordi, Loh & Strauss (2004) Wibig & Wolfendale (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correlation coefficient is computed outside a galactic mask. A cross-correlation analysis of CMB data with external data sets was already used in the literature in a variety of ways, for example, in Afshordi, Loh & Strauss (2004); Coles et al (2004); ; Bernardi et al (2005); Naselsky et al (2005); Alvarez et al (2006); Rassat et al (2007); Land & Slosar (2007); Sarkar, Datta & Bharadwaj (2009); Hernandez-Monteagudo (2010); Lopez-Corredoira, Labini & Betancort-Rijo (2010); Naselsky et al (2010); Sawangwit et al (2010); Ilic et al (2011); Taburet et al (2011); Hansen et al (2012); Wibig & Wolfendale (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%