Proceedings of 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2017) 2017
DOI: 10.22323/1.301.0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic Ray Modulation Observed by the Princess Sirindhorn Neutron Monitor at High Rigidity Cutoff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the second modulation period, from 2011 January to 2014 June (trimesters 13 to 26), both L and C stayed in the same range with some fluctuations, including Forbush decreases, which have not been removed in the present analysis. ( [13] showed that some but not all Forbush decreases in C are also accompanied by decreases in L.) This corresponds to a special 4-year plateau in C at Doi Inthanon, corresponding to the time when the heliospheric current sheet tilt angle 50 • , a plateau was not observed in NM at low cutoff rigidity [9]. The weak variation of L confirms that there was little systematic change in modulation conditions during this time period above the Doi Inthanon cutoff rigidity of about 17 GV.…”
Section: Pos(icrc2017)025mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the second modulation period, from 2011 January to 2014 June (trimesters 13 to 26), both L and C stayed in the same range with some fluctuations, including Forbush decreases, which have not been removed in the present analysis. ( [13] showed that some but not all Forbush decreases in C are also accompanied by decreases in L.) This corresponds to a special 4-year plateau in C at Doi Inthanon, corresponding to the time when the heliospheric current sheet tilt angle 50 • , a plateau was not observed in NM at low cutoff rigidity [9]. The weak variation of L confirms that there was little systematic change in modulation conditions during this time period above the Doi Inthanon cutoff rigidity of about 17 GV.…”
Section: Pos(icrc2017)025mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that NM count rates are essentially always corrected for pressure variation, and at the tropical location of Doi Inthanon, correction for water vapor is necessary when studying bare counter rates and the leader fraction [13]. [It even affects the count rate, with a peak-to-peak seasonal variation of 0.3% [9], but we do not correct the count rate for water vapor in the present work.] Those works described corrections based on the surface water vapor pressure E w at Doi Inthanon as calculated from the Global Atmospheric Data Assimilation (GDAS) database (see http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/gdas1.php).…”
Section: Normalization and Correction Of The Leader Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the term "solar modulation" most commonly refers to effects of the ∼11-year sunspot cycle and the ∼22-year solar magnetic cycle, in this category we also include other studies of temporal variations in the GCR distribution, including changes in the GCR flux and anisotropy. The temporal variations are due to solar and heliospheric effects while the GCRs propagate from outside the heliosphere to Earth, including effects of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), magnetic turbulence, and solar wind speed [50]. While the longer-term variations provide remote sensing of large-scale heliospheric conditions, shorter-term variations are due to more local effects, such as 27-day variations in GCRs due the solar rotation and associated changes in the solar wind passing the detector's location, as well as temporary Forbush decreases in the GCR flux due to solar storms or high speed solar wind streams.…”
Section: Solar Modulation Of Galactic Cosmic Rays (32)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to GCR spectral variations over a solar cycle, [50] reported a distinct pattern of solar modulation at high cutoff rigidity (at Doi Inthanon, Thailand) compared with that at low cutoff (at McMurdo, Antarctica). At solar maximum conditions (or specifically, when the HCS tilt angle was high), the modulation at high cutoff rigidity tracked the magnetic field intensity.…”
Section: Spectral Variations (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%