1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02507316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic rays and high-energy interactions. Is there a necessity for a new phenomenon?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may come again from the lateral distribution becoming flatter more rapidly than the reduction of the total size: the net result is that the densities (at 600 m) are 5-10% larger in the bin = 20 • -30 • than the vertical density when the atmospheric depth separating the array and the shower maximum becomes lower than three cascade units. Some systematic errors could also enter the position of the shower axis [15] as the relation ( 6) is constant in the central part (α is fixed to 1.2), with consequences on the estimator S 600 .…”
Section: The Attenuation Length For Density Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may come again from the lateral distribution becoming flatter more rapidly than the reduction of the total size: the net result is that the densities (at 600 m) are 5-10% larger in the bin = 20 • -30 • than the vertical density when the atmospheric depth separating the array and the shower maximum becomes lower than three cascade units. Some systematic errors could also enter the position of the shower axis [15] as the relation ( 6) is constant in the central part (α is fixed to 1.2), with consequences on the estimator S 600 .…”
Section: The Attenuation Length For Density Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most popular (LUND) model developed by Anderson et al [8] it was assumed a stochastic emission of hadrons in the division of quark-gluon strings and energy invariance of fragmentation functions. This model has been adapted to the simulations of EAS with SIBYLL [9], and HDPM [10] generators. Secondary particle spectra in those generators obey Feynman scaling because there simplified LUND fragmentation functions are used which obey Feynman scaling, and quark structure functions 3 (3) asymptotically independent on interaction energy.…”
Section: Brief Review Of Hadronization Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the shape of the x-spectra in the central region has been studied in three versions of DPM [10] (in which Feynman scaling is conserved in the fragmentation region). Only a version with rather strong rise of central rapidity cross section, dn dy = 0.08( s 1 GeV 2 ) 0.27 predicts a realistic rise of multiplicity.…”
Section: Verification Of Microdynamic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%