Cosmic Rays at Earth 2001
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044450710-5/50005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic Rays at Sea Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
85
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
2
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield function should not be confused with the so‐called production function S i ( E , h ), which is defined as the number of nuclide atoms produced in the unit atmospheric layer per one incident particle with the energy E . In a case of the isotropic particle distribution, these quantities are related as Y=πS, where π is the conversion factor between the particle intensity in space and the particle flux at the top of the atmosphere (see, e.g., chapter 1.6.2 in Grieder, 2001).…”
Section: Production Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield function should not be confused with the so‐called production function S i ( E , h ), which is defined as the number of nuclide atoms produced in the unit atmospheric layer per one incident particle with the energy E . In a case of the isotropic particle distribution, these quantities are related as Y=πS, where π is the conversion factor between the particle intensity in space and the particle flux at the top of the atmosphere (see, e.g., chapter 1.6.2 in Grieder, 2001).…”
Section: Production Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the effects of local surroundings and atmospheric structure require detailed study for each location. While much interesting science can be done without precise knowledge of the yield function [ Grieder , ], a neutron monitor will become a more powerful instrument when its yield function is fully understood and data from the worldwide network of neutron monitors can be combined to precisely track the GCR spectrum. Combining data from neutron monitors at various cutoff rigidities can also be useful in the analyses of relativistic solar particle events [ Cramp et al , ; Vashenyuk et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hadronic interaction models used at high and low energies were QGSJETII-4 and GHEISHA, respectively (see the CORSIKA manual for more details [2]). The distribution of primaries at the top of the atmosphere was calculated according to [3], taking into account the measured spectra for nuclei with atomic number within the range 1 ≤ Z ≤ 28 [4]. In Figure 2, we show the fluence at the detector level for the FCFM campus and in Figure 3 for the top of the Tacaná volcano site.…”
Section: Computation Of Fluence At the Detector's Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%