2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00119-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmological consequences of MSSM flat directions

Abstract: We review the cosmological implications of the flat directions of the Minimally Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). We describe how field condensates are created along the flat directions because of inflationary fluctuations.The post-inflationary dynamical evolution of the field condensate can charge up the condensate with B or L in a process known as Affleck-Dine baryogenesis. Condensate fluctuations can give rise to both adiabatic and isocurvature density perturbations and could be observable in future cos… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
211
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 589 publications
(1,019 reference statements)
3
211
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In numerous models (for a review see [7]) the role of the inflaton has been performed by the Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] or a boson in Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) [16,17] or a scalar boson in supersymmetric (SUSY) models [18][19][20] (see [21,22] as reviews). A number of advantages of simplified SUSY GUTs in comparison with nonsupersymmetric GUTs such as naturally longer period of exponential expansion and better stability of the effective Higgs potential with respect to radiative corrections due to cancelation of loop diagrams have been noted quite long ago [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In numerous models (for a review see [7]) the role of the inflaton has been performed by the Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] or a boson in Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) [16,17] or a scalar boson in supersymmetric (SUSY) models [18][19][20] (see [21,22] as reviews). A number of advantages of simplified SUSY GUTs in comparison with nonsupersymmetric GUTs such as naturally longer period of exponential expansion and better stability of the effective Higgs potential with respect to radiative corrections due to cancelation of loop diagrams have been noted quite long ago [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the flat-directions have gauge and yukawa couplings to other matter fields, one also needs to take into account the effect of renormalization (RGE) from the scale at which they are introduced (typically the compactification scale in string compactifications ∼ M GUT , M s ) to lower scales (∼ H I ). So, it could happen that RG effects could make the effective mass-squared parameter (m eff φ ) 2 negative at some scale Q c even if c 3 is positive O(1) [26]. As argued in [26], the LH u direction is most likely to develop a negative mass-squared parameter for a wide range of c 3 (both positive and negative) due to RG evolution because of the large top yukawa coupling.…”
Section: Jhep05(2009)083mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…So, it could happen that RG effects could make the effective mass-squared parameter (m eff φ ) 2 negative at some scale Q c even if c 3 is positive O(1) [26]. As argued in [26], the LH u direction is most likely to develop a negative mass-squared parameter for a wide range of c 3 (both positive and negative) due to RG evolution because of the large top yukawa coupling. The LH u direction has other advantages as well in addition to providing a mechanism for generating the B − L asymmetry and giving rise to viable neutrino masses.…”
Section: Jhep05(2009)083mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 For the purpose of illustration, let us consider the 1 By visible sector we mean that the inflaton itself carries the SM charges, such as in the case of MSSM [38][39][40][41]. In all these examples the inflaton Φ is the D-flat direction made up of squarks and sleptons, see [57], which is lifted by the F -term of the non-renormalizable superpotential.…”
Section: Jhep04(2014)077mentioning
confidence: 99%