2015
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmological leverage from the matter power spectrum in the presence of baryon and nonlinear effects

Abstract: We investigate how the use of higher wavenumbers (smaller scales) in the galaxy clustering power spectrum influences cosmological constraints. We take into account uncertainties from nonlinear density fluctuations, (scale dependent) galaxy bias, and baryonic effects. Allowing for substantially model independent uncertainties through separate fit parameters in each wavenumber bin that also allow for the redshift evolution, we quantify strong gains in dark energy and neutrino mass leverage with increasing maximu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many different approaches to parameterizing the scale dependence (e.g. Bielefeld et al 2015) and redshift dependence (e.g. Fry 1996;Matarrese et al 1997;Clerkin et al 2015) of the bias have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Bias Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different approaches to parameterizing the scale dependence (e.g. Bielefeld et al 2015) and redshift dependence (e.g. Fry 1996;Matarrese et al 1997;Clerkin et al 2015) of the bias have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Bias Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…via gravitational lensing) will be key to achieve sufficient understanding of the small-scale clustering. As in the case of large-scale systematics, self-calibration via flexible modeling of the remaining systematics [208,209], and projecting out information that is affected by the systematics while keeping the bulk of the cosmological information [102,206,210], can both be very effective.…”
Section: Observational Systematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we have the tools to investigate the standard model, the next challenge is to be able to compare those data with cosmologies that go beyond General Relativity, in order to test whether a fluid component like Dark Energy or similarly a Modified Gravity scenario can better fit the data. On the theoretical side, while many Modified Gravity models are still allowed by type Ia supernova (SNIa) and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data [1]; structure formation can help us to distinguish among them and the standard scenario, thanks to their signatures on the matter power spectrum, in the linear and mildly non-linear regimes (for some examples of forecasts, see [2][3][4]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%