The concept of material agency can and should apply to museum collection strategies. Drawing on studies of preservationist homeowners who, in restoring their homes, discover the agency of previous builders and occupants in shaping the house's material qualities, this study proposes a broad concept of "habitability" to guide collecting and for actualizing the agency of older objects. A second area of inquiry examines domestic technologies designed to help humans with daily tasks. Some of these include "smart appliances" and robotics that become increasingly "normalized" through habitual use. [domestic consumption, preservation, smart appliances, designer intention, object assemblage]In pursuing questions of how museum policy ought to be shaped to deal with collections in the rapidly evolving commercial and digital world, Alison Clarke (this volume) has provided us with a deft overview of theories of material agency and their application to objects as the carriers of meaning. Drawing on anthropological and philosophical roots, and recent anthropological developments in the study of material culture, she observes that the idea that things could be more than passive carriers or props-that they, like people, could have gender, names, biographies, or influence-is increasingly activated and displayed in contemporary consumption behavior. Clarke cites anthropologists Daniel Miller (2005Miller ( , 2008 and Alfred Gell (1998) in her discussion of material agency, the former for his extensive work on consumption and material culture, and the latter for his contributions to the study of art. Miller's concept of agency, drawing on Bruno Latour, argues that "material forms have consequences for people that are autonomous from human agency" (2005:11), but Gell (1998:16) focuses on the distributed agency of the artist in creating the artifact, where the artist's agency, or intention, invested in the making of art influences the viewer, and material agency is secondary.As Clarke notes, however, some scholars like Tim Dant (2005) are significantly less confident that material agency can ever equal that of humans. Clarke describes Dant's approach as emphasizing the "everyday, practical interactions between people and things, subjects and objects" (Dant 2005:6) in which humans transfer their own agency to objects. In response to these provocative ideas, Clarke acquaints us with emerging shopping trends and examples of contemporary objects that may find their way into future collections by emphasizing the new social contexts and rules by which materials are consumed. She suggests that as academic discourse problematizes objects in terms of their agency, a reframing of materiality and consumption may be underway. She notes how performance artists reflexively and self-consciously explore how objects make up the urban subject, while ordinary urbanites engage in decluttering, purifying themselves of their codependency with objects. She observes in the thriving culture of eBay, with collectibles constituting the "heart and soul" ...