2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2022)201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmologies, singularities and quantum extremal surfaces

Abstract: Following [1], we study quantum extremal surfaces in various families of cosmologies with Big-Crunch singularities, by extremizing the generalized entropy in 2-dimensional backgrounds which can be thought of as arising from dimensional reduction. Focussing first on the isotropic AdS Kasner case, introducing a spatial regulator enables relating the locations in time of the quantum extremal surface and the observer. This shows that the quantum extremal surface lags behind the observer location. A potential islan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why it is even possible to apply the derived expressions for the entropy to de Sitter space, is that they are agnostic about the precise background under consideration. While originally studied in the context of holography in Anti-de Sitter space, by now many works have applied this so-called island formula to other backgrounds, such as a plethora of black hole solutions [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and cosmological spacetimes [14,15,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. As long as it is possible to unambiguously define a subsystem entangled with a gravitating region, the island formula applies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason why it is even possible to apply the derived expressions for the entropy to de Sitter space, is that they are agnostic about the precise background under consideration. While originally studied in the context of holography in Anti-de Sitter space, by now many works have applied this so-called island formula to other backgrounds, such as a plethora of black hole solutions [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and cosmological spacetimes [14,15,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. As long as it is possible to unambiguously define a subsystem entangled with a gravitating region, the island formula applies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present context, one can study the generalized entropy for such I + observers as well (see [71] for some discussions on classical RT/HRT surfaces at I + in SdS, and [103] and earlier work in dS). This reveals quantum extremal surfaces that are timelike-separated from observers at I + : there are parallels with studies in the Poincare patch of de Sitter [85], [101]. In SdS however, one might imagine mapping the radiation region R + to a corresponding interval at the future boundary e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…the imaginary part arising from log(−1) in the timelike separation in the interval (more generally the real part contains ∆ 2 < 0). This imaginary part has appeared previously in studies of quantum extremal surfaces in de Sitter with regard to the future boundary [22,23].…”
Section: -Dim Cft Timelike Subsystems Complex Eementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Imaginary values also arise in studies of quantum extremal surfaces in de Sitter with regard to the future boundary [22,23], stemming from timelike-separations (sec. 2.3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%