2019
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmology in the era of Euclid and the Square Kilometre Array

Abstract: Theoretical uncertainties on non-linear scales are among the main obstacles to exploit the sensitivity of forthcoming galaxy and hydrogen surveys like Euclid or the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). Here, we devise a new method to model the theoretical error that goes beyond the usual cut-off on small scales. The advantage of this more efficient implementation of the non-linear uncertainties is tested through a Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo (MCMC) forecast of the sensitivity of Euclid and SKA to the parameters of the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
190
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
6
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the precision of the shape parameter measurements from these surveys will be comparable to that of Planck, and the combination of the two will reduce the errorbars by a factor of few due to degeneracy breaking [34]. This effect will be essential for the future neutrino mass measurements [28,34,[75][76][77][78][79]. The presented constraints set a reference mark for future LSS and CMB observations that will surpass Planck and BOSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the precision of the shape parameter measurements from these surveys will be comparable to that of Planck, and the combination of the two will reduce the errorbars by a factor of few due to degeneracy breaking [34]. This effect will be essential for the future neutrino mass measurements [28,34,[75][76][77][78][79]. The presented constraints set a reference mark for future LSS and CMB observations that will surpass Planck and BOSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will now move on to present an MCMC analysis using the monopole, quadrupole, and hexadecapole spectra. An MCMC analysis is generally expected to be more reliable than Fisher matrix forecasts, as it can probe non-Gaussian posteriors and does not suffer from numerical instabilities that can sometimes be encountered in Fisher analyses [67]. It also closely resembles a real data analysis procedure, and allows us to study biases on the estimation of the cosmological parameter of interest, f [36].…”
Section: Eftoflss-based Model Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These corrections can be estimated and added to the covariance matrix as a correlated error [20]. This treatment is different from a usually employed approach of trusting the theory completely until a certain wavenumber k max [39,[51][52][53][54]. Using such a cut-off means that all information coming from wavenumbers higher than k max is thrown away.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%