“…Several reasons justify the creation of this second General Assembly, such as the following: (1) the current system in which each State has the right to one vote is undemocratic, as it creates a disproportion of representation between people from less and more populous countries, as well as and in relation to the participation of each of the States in the world economy, so that a review of this situation is a precondition for expanding the powers of the UN (Kahler, 2007); (2) the representation of States in the UN is determined mainly by the de facto control of their power, and not by the legitimacy of the government, so that it may not represent all citizens (thus, if a State refuses to appoint the representatives of the people elected according to democratic norms, the Assembly itself could recognize the authority to represent political forces that demonstrate to represent the people); (3) even in democratic States there are significant differences between the opinions of the rulers and those that may be expressed by the representatives of individuals, as the Assembly of Peoples will also represent minorities and the opposition (Höffe, 2005); (4) there is no global instance in which the effective participation of subjects and civil society is ensured, nor instruments that allow accountability of international organizations for their decisions and for their acts (Held, 1995); (5) finally:…”