2007
DOI: 10.1086/516582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COSMOS Morphological Classification with the Zurich Estimator of Structural Types (ZEST) and the Evolution Since z = 1 of the Luminosity Function of Early, Disk, and Irregular Galaxies

Abstract: Motivated by the desire to reliably and automatically classify structure of thousands of COSMOS galaxies, we present ZEST, the Zurich Estimator of Structural Types. To classify galaxy structure, ZEST uses (1) five nonparametric diagnostics: asymmetry, concentration, Gini coefficient, second-order moment of the brightest 20% of galaxy pixels, and ellipticity; and (2) the exponent n of single-Sérsic fits to the two-dimensional surface brightness distributions. To fully exploit the wealth of information while red… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
132
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
9
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for consistency, we decided to simply use Sersic indices (n) to compare the structures (morphologies) of zCOSMOS and SDSS galaxies. As is well known (e.g., Blanton et al 2003a;Scarlata et al 2007) n > 2.5 galaxies correspond mostly to galaxies classified as early-types spheroid-dominated galaxies, while n < 1.5 galaxies are mostly objects classified as late-type diskdominated galaxies.…”
Section: Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, for consistency, we decided to simply use Sersic indices (n) to compare the structures (morphologies) of zCOSMOS and SDSS galaxies. As is well known (e.g., Blanton et al 2003a;Scarlata et al 2007) n > 2.5 galaxies correspond mostly to galaxies classified as early-types spheroid-dominated galaxies, while n < 1.5 galaxies are mostly objects classified as late-type diskdominated galaxies.…”
Section: Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Automated morphological classifications using the ZEST scheme (ZEST; Scarlata et al 2007) are also available.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purposes of this paper, we consider the 'environment' of a galaxy to be defined by the local mass overdensity, measured using the local overdensity of galaxies as a proxy; over quasi-linear 1 It should be noted that other studies have arrived at different conclusions regarding the evolution in the early-type luminosity density (e.g. Scarlata et al 2007a), especially at the massive end of the red sequence (Scarlata et al 2007b). 2 There is some debate within the community regarding the evolution in the number density of blue galaxies at intermediate and low redshift.…”
Section: Measurements Of Local Galaxy Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the initial work by Abraham et al (1994Abraham et al ( , 1996, the Concentration-Asymmetry-Smoothness (CAS) space was established by Conselice (2003) and the Gini and Asymmetry parameters by Lotz et al (2004). Scarlata et al (2007) added ellipticity for Hubble type classification. The benefits of quantified morphology parameters are that there is no need for an observer, they can be applied to rest-frame UV images, which trace the triggered star-formation in interacting galaxies and the galaxies have an intrinsically high surface brightness, aiding their detection.…”
Section: Quantified Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%