2013
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost‐analysis of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation compared to surgical pulmonary valve replacement

Abstract: PPVI holds a significant cost advantage over the surgical approach, fewer hospital days, and incurs less patient wage loss. Furthermore, it would need to have a very high failure rate at 10 years to lose its cost advantage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surgical alternative with valved conduit implantation requires longer hospital stay, is not free of either early or late complications, and requires repeated re-interventions of increasing complexity and risk. A recent report from Vergales et al shows that in the USA the total cost of PPVI is less than surgical valve replacement and that it would require a very dramatic short term survival of the PPVI to be less competitive; this study reflects the US financial data but cannot be extrapolated to the European situation [26]. [27]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The surgical alternative with valved conduit implantation requires longer hospital stay, is not free of either early or late complications, and requires repeated re-interventions of increasing complexity and risk. A recent report from Vergales et al shows that in the USA the total cost of PPVI is less than surgical valve replacement and that it would require a very dramatic short term survival of the PPVI to be less competitive; this study reflects the US financial data but cannot be extrapolated to the European situation [26]. [27]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Recurrent changes in their health,6 initiate new treatment demands . A mean length of a hospital stay after a change of the pulmonary valve was 5.7 days with a mean stay of 2.8 in the intensive care unit 7. Patients treated with percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation went home 1 day after treatment 7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mean length of a hospital stay after a change of the pulmonary valve was 5.7 days with a mean stay of 2.8 in the intensive care unit 7. Patients treated with percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation went home 1 day after treatment 7. In a limited number of studies investigating experiences in patients with congenital heart disease using qualitative methods, normalisation is documented to be a central issue 6 8–10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As percutaneous techniques become more frequent and more companies enter the market a reduction in the device cost may be expected and thus give a more favourable in-hospital cost outcome [17, 18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%