2018
DOI: 10.46792/fuoyejet.v3i1.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost and Calorie Analysis of Food Consumption in Artisanal Fishery Households in North-Western and North-Central Nigeria

Abstract: A study was conducted to assess- the food calorie intake and factors that determine food security status of fisherfolks in North-Central and North-Western Nigeria. Data were collected from 267 rural fishery households using a multi-stage random sampling procedure. The main tools of analysis include descriptive statistics, Cost of calorie intake and Tobit models. The study revealed that the fishery household heads were male dominated (94%); average age of 49 years with mean adjusted household size of 8. The est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A threshold value of 2260kcal recommended by FAO was used as a benchmark that defines calorie intake food security. The formula is as follows (Abdulrahman et al, 2017;Oladimeji et al, 2018):…”
Section: Calorie Intake Food Security Index (Ci)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A threshold value of 2260kcal recommended by FAO was used as a benchmark that defines calorie intake food security. The formula is as follows (Abdulrahman et al, 2017;Oladimeji et al, 2018):…”
Section: Calorie Intake Food Security Index (Ci)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foster et al (1984) suggested a cost of calorie intake index to find the minimum cost that can finance the minimum calorie required to maintain the body and the soul together. Below is the formula (Abdulrahman et al, 2017;Oladimeji et al, 2018):…”
Section: Calorie Intake Head Count Ratio (H)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T-statistics adopted from Oladimeji et al (2016) was used to determine the hypotheses that state that land degraded had no impact on food security and productivity of farmers. The formula is given as: 4) where; X1 = food expenditure in N (a proxy for food security)/average output kg(a proxy for productivity) from arable crop farmers affected by land degradation, X2 = average output (kg)/food expenditure (N) from arable crop farmers not affected by land degradation, …”
Section: Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to the fact that education create awareness on land degradation issues and enhance adoption of new innovation and techniques on land management practices. Awotide et al (2015), Oladimeji et al (2016), andOgunniyi et al (2018), have shown that education plays systematic role in adoption of technology. The coefficient of farm size holdings was positive and statistically significant at 1% level of probability.…”
Section: Propensity Score Of the Arable Crop Farmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this, this research is designed to carefully establish the relevance of Shari'ah to curbing insecurity in the North Central, Nigeria. Oladimeji, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%