2009
DOI: 10.1080/00207540802068631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost and quality of service analysis of production systems based on the cumulative downtime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this table, probability of system failure can be changed. Considering the consequences estimated by a cost C f [7], then the process risk is F(T)*C f , where T represent the maintenance interval.…”
Section: Using the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this table, probability of system failure can be changed. Considering the consequences estimated by a cost C f [7], then the process risk is F(T)*C f , where T represent the maintenance interval.…”
Section: Using the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cost also depends on the size of stock (buffers or work-in-process). A thorough analysis of such costs is presented in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manufacturers try to cope with this increased complexity of their production processes by focusing on their core competencies so that the in-house production depth can be decreased. Faria et al 2010). Possibilities of cheap procurement have arisen in recent years due to a reduction in transportation costs.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the random characteristics of the production task, Li et al 10 proposed a calculating method of the probability of customer demand satisfaction to analyze the running state of manufacturing systems. Faria and Matos 11 proposed the nonlinear relationship between the probability of successfully accomplishing a mission and the cumulative production downtime of machines. These studies analyzed the performance of manufacturing systems from the perspective of task completion probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%