Cost and value analysis of software development method focused on individual function

Shimoda, Atsushi; Yabuki, Tetsuichiro

doi:10.1109/intelcis.2017.8260053

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mob,Web, Lrn, Lib, Agile,Game 7- [9], [30], [33], [36], [37], [4], [43] Easy for transition and use Data, Lrn, Agile, Soft development…”

Section: Process Flexible and Adaptivementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eliminating excessive and unnecessary meetings Mob 1- [30] Less rework Lib 1- [37] Getting fast feedbacks…”

Section: Process Flexible and Adaptivementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kanban teams feel more powerful to address their internal processes and respond quickly with its continuous flow management allowing constant re-planning to uncertainty and frequent changes and faster responses. They can deliver results earlier with frequent releases and division of the work in very small-time chunks [37], [48]. Kanban is also simpler and paves the way to an easier transition with less cost, time, chaos and turbulence.…”

Section: Collective Understandingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Scrum, Kanban or a Mix of Both? A Systematic Literature Review

Ozkan¹,

Bal²,

Erdogan³

et al. 2022

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

4Among the Agile methods, Scrum and Kanban are widely used in software development and they are considered the two most effective ones influencing the direct results of projects. Despite the importance of knowing their relative strengths and advantages and integrating them to achieve better results than individual use, none of the secondary studies provide extensive knowledge on the topic. In this paper, we performed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) study to investigate the characteristics of the empirical studies which involve Scrum and Kanban by comparing or integrating them. Our final set includes 38 studies posing primary information on the advantages of each method over another one, the properties including artifacts, roles, and events from Scrum and Kanban in combining them in a hybrid way, and the properties of transitions from one to another such as transition directions (Scrum to Kanban, Kanban to Scrum or Scrum/Kanban to Hybrid), transition years, and transition reasons. The outputs can be interesting for both industry and researchers. For example, nearly all of the transitioning organizations are moving from Scrum to Kanban or to hybrid method. Among the reasons for the transitions, the problems experienced with Scrum are remarkable. In comparison, Kanban stands out clearly in a positive way. Almost all of the teams combining both use flow instead of a sprint.

show abstract

“…Mob,Web, Lrn, Lib, Agile,Game 7- [9], [30], [33], [36], [37], [4], [43] Easy for transition and use Data, Lrn, Agile, Soft development…”

Section: Process Flexible and Adaptivementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eliminating excessive and unnecessary meetings Mob 1- [30] Less rework Lib 1- [37] Getting fast feedbacks…”

Section: Process Flexible and Adaptivementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Collective Understandingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Scrum, Kanban or a Mix of Both? A Systematic Literature Review

Ozkan¹,

Bal²,

Erdogan³

et al. 2022

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…So far, various studies have been reported to select a software development method and approaches. For example, research that recommends a development method with higher aptitude compared with past projects has been conducted in [6], [7].…”

Section: Related Work / Literatur Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is a method to compare past and new projects and to select a development method suitable for the new project. For example, research has been conducted to select a development method of a new project by analysing past projects in terms of agile development and a project characteristics [7]. A technique for selecting a development method using the survey result on project agility [8] has been reported in [9].…”

Section: Related Work / Literatur Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expert Survey on Current Trends in Agile, Disciplined and Hybrid Practices for Software Development

Nikiforova

Babris

Madelāne

2021

Applied Computer Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Every software development company makes software development based on a specific approach. There are a number of approaches to software development, both disciplined and agile. Each approach includes a set of different activities. Sometimes, the specific nature of a company’s work requires a specific approach, but the need to make work more efficient, faster and better requires implementing activities of other approaches. Then hybrid software development approaches come in. The paper presents an expert survey to examine the most important software development activities, the combinations of development approaches that are used in software development processes and the way of upgrading existing approaches. The evaluated activities of software development process are classified according to their nature – whether they correspond with a team, organisation, documentation, development, and testing. The conclusions are also made on the practices that are required most – disciplined, Agile or hybrid.

show abstract